[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xmca] Employee Free Choice Act
- To: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <email@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [xmca] Employee Free Choice Act
- From: Mike Cole <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:29:02 -0700
- Delivered-to: email@example.com
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:reply-to:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=tZjs/kjnfzBm7owGs9eS6AA/15jaS6zxpdricFAh1sM=; b=OQjw9YQrF5GuODxLK3m+gZPbe8gKO8oo8OMkuSRf9hRYGeVaJuwdqu50RF1Wsq4LTm artHB3Tn3ygzOUpZXmrDC8Ge3Izl6n7z8/VAgfwGJT0e72UT7/g0E6hjoVrClX2lLjWr kBMSXdAT5qtavDuuQDg1+2IX8PnkwHCuEC4Sk=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; b=Q95aOJElbKcV3mVB6zt9YfgnSpG1Vwd+zzl1gF7OKVw4DWk4RsHBGMk/RcVekq2Vhh wv2+sQRAf65kFLzpKsZQDuAnTXFmtJgATm0nsh6XW3cYry/VbNcaRiz7y6nvRuane/QA fIHoO0gByB3953+tYW5VhDeSNCHTdhBCCFcHg=
- In-reply-to: <D032BC21AB3F9F43BC8E97CC7E1794DA326A206063@DSMAILBOX.ad.uiuc.edu>
- List-archive: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/private/xmca>
- List-help: <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=help>
- List-id: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca.weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-post: <mailto:email@example.com>
- List-subscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:email@example.com?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <00ee01c9ae29$c4e64fd0$4eb2ef70$@edu> <D032BC21AB3F9F43BC8E97CC7E1794DA326A206063@DSMAILBOX.ad.uiuc.edu>
- Reply-to: firstname.lastname@example.org, "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <email@example.com>
- Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org
What form of action do you recommend?
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Worthen, Helena Harlow <
> Hello, all --
> I don't usually do this, and I won't do it often.
> However, I've recently been having conversations with people who one might
> expect to intuitively support the Employee Free Choice Act, which is in
> Congress right now, but who are skeptical about it because of the "secret
> ballot" issue and the idea that "unions want this" -- which usually means
> that something shady is going on.
> The Employee Free Choice Act allows for majority choice (if a majority of
> employees at a workplace sign a card saying they want union representation,
> they've got it), arbitration of first contracts (meaning that if an employer
> and a union can't come to an agreement within two or three months, the
> process first goes to mediation then to arbitration, and they get a
> contract) and financial penalties against employers who retaliate against
> workers for union activity by, for example, firing and blacklisting them.
> These are all just enhancements of existing law, the 1935 National Labor
> Relations Act, which is widely -- I'd say almost universally -- defied,
> ignored, etc and which lacks teeth. Employers are by law required to bargain
> "in good faith" but if they don't -- no problem!
> The "secret ballot" issue is a very effective red herring. It appeals to
> people who understand that unions have something to do with democracy and
> "civic engagement" but don't have enough direct awareness of how severe and
> relentless employer opposition to organizing has been over the last 30
> years. The way things are now, there is no such thing as a secret ballot. In
> fact, the only protection a worker can invoke if he or she gets fired during
> a campaign is if he or she can prove that the employer was aware that he or
> she was pro-union!
> In the discourse that's out there, what you hear is that "unions" want
> EFCA. Actually, unions don't need EFCA - people without unions need it. But
> unions -- especially the AFL-CIO -- are carrying the water for it, because
> no one else can because they'll get fired, blacklisted, etc. Which is what
> EFCA is all about.
> I've recently been in some environments where good people congregate and
> I've been struck once again by how little is known by even very well-meaning
> and conscious people about work, working conditions, and the need for
> representation in the context of work. So in case someone asks you, "What is
> this EFCA thing all about, isn't it just thug unions trying to crush the
> secret ballot?" Now you know.
> xmca mailing list
xmca mailing list