Ed-- I interpret Ana's questionS to involve the issue of transfer and
activities and partipants involvement in those relational connections.
This also connects with Yrjo's characterization of 3rd generation ch/at
focuses on connections between activity systems.
Maybe your question could also be interpreted as a request to clarify the
relations between ch/at
and COP approaches to knowledge acquisition and transfer??
On 9/11/05, Ed Wall <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> How does your question interface with the work of Jean Lave and
> colleagues? A refinement?
> Ed Wall
> >I thought this question went to the whole list, but it ended just in
> >Mike's box. Here it is again:
> > My question is the interaction between different activities: what can be
> > "taken" from one activity to another? (Old question of the universals)
> > Also: what can be created only in a combination of several activities.
> > This is what I mean: we all participate in more than one activity all
> > the time. Is it possible to learn something in one activity and then use
> > it in another? In other words: what does it mean to "transport" a
> > way of
> > acting, behaving, or thinking from one activity to another?
> > And - what is a product only of participating in a certain
> > combination of activities at the same time?
> > In my workshop in Sevilla I will explore interaction between the
> > "imaginary" and the "real" -- passing through in and out, and the
> > relationships between the two -- and what are the outcomes of this
> > relationship.
> > See you in Sevilla
> > Ana
> > Mike Cole wrote:
> > > You have a question about ch/at you might want answered during
> > your trip??
> > > A shame Helena could not come, and odd about that symposium. Odd
> > about
> > > the whole
> > > setup!
> > >
> > > See you in Sevilla.
> > > mike
> >xmca mailing list
> xmca mailing list
xmca mailing list
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Oct 01 2005 - 01:00:11 PDT