Thanks, Don. I will not distribute to new york times.
I keep trying to post to xmca from my gmail account but the message
with a few pages
from Valsiner re symbol formation does not seem to make it. Lets see
if this one does!
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 10:38:52 -0500, Cunningham, Donald J.
> Mike, I have a paper (entry for an encyclopedia) that might be of help
> with respect to semiotics:
> This is a first version, not to be cited or reproduced. The publisher in
> question threatens dire consequences! But for what it is worth, have a
> look and I would appreciate feedback........djc
> Don Cunningham
> Indiana University
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Cole [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2005 12:01 AM
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: Re: "activity theory" vs. semiotics
> Rather than a word count, could anyone help with clarification of the
> use of the terms
> sign, symbol, and meaning as they relate to activity theory and
> semiotics? Progress along this line seems meagre, or at least, my
> ability to summarize it is meagre!
> On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 04:44:35 +0000, firstname.lastname@example.org
> <email@example.com> wrote:
> > Not that any of this is serious of course, but with the rules of this
> google site when you put in "activity theory", in quotes, you are not
> simply combining terms but actually looking for the string "activity
> theory" *including* the quotes. Googlefight already combines terms
> (look at the URL details of googlefight to see the differences. Quotes
> will be encoded as %22)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 01 2005 - 01:00:04 PST