Re: Moonstruck: fantasy or fact

From: Katherine Goff (Katherine_Goff@ceo.cudenver.edu)
Date: Thu Mar 22 2001 - 08:11:10 PST


xmca@weber.ucsd.edu writes:
>Funny story. Last night I started watching a fox conspiracy show about if
>we
>ever really made it to the moon. About 5 minutes into the show my brothers
>called asking me for my insights if NASA ever made it to the moon. The
>waving flag still gots me thinking but I was curious what my 9 year old
>son's thoughts were on the matter.

my 14 year old son watched that program with the intensity he usually
reserves for the Simpsons.

i sat with him for a while and i wondered at the fluidity of human
perception,
of how we interpret the same evidence differently-
what i mostly wondered was
why do the conspiracy proponents like their conceptual framework better
than the NASA framework?
what do they get out of believing in a conspiracy by our government?
what do i get out of believing humans did walk on the moon?

kathie

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Words are the thunders of the mind.
Words are the refinement of the flesh.
Words are the responses to the thousand curvaceous moments---
     we just manage it---
     sweet and electric, words flow from the brain
     and out the gate of the mouth.

We make books of them, out of hesitations and grammar.
We are slow, and choosy.
This is the world.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            Mary Oliver - The Leaf and the
Cloud
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Katherine_Goff@ceo.cudenver.edu
http://ceo.cudenver.edu/~katherine_goff/index.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 01 2001 - 01:01:13 PST