Pushing the language towards the differences that *we* would value as
differences that make all the difference was what I was dreamily after when
I wrote:
At 08.55 +0200 98-05-05, Eva Ekeblad wrote:
>a challenge of developing a language of the psychosocial
>that starts more globally, more inclusively
>than with "mind" and "mental"
while Naoiki Ueno seems to have read in it
At 00.12 +0900 98-05-06, Naoki Ueno wrote:
>"A doctrine of objectivity that promises transcendence",
With "global" I was trying to say "undifferentiated" (a fresh start, with
possibilities for less soiled subdivisions than "traditional" arrays of
dichotomies)
NOT "global" as in "universal"
in that part
Eva
with no time to expand on
the concrete presences
of assessment practices
in overwhelming forms of education
off to the train