[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xmca-l] Re: Messages on XMCA

My strength is in the fundamentals. So I would start with the fundamentals (action, artefact, consciousness,...) which don't need to refer to the higher level concepts (like zoped, learning, ...), where others would do better. I am thinking in terms of a collaborative effort, of course.

*Andy Blunden*

Helen Grimmett wrote:
The trouble is always working out where to start. Which term do you discuss
first without having explained any of the terms you need to explain the
first one?! A wiki with lots of hyperlinks possibly makes this a lot
easier. I take it you were being facetious when you called this simple?  :)


Dr Helen Grimmett
Lecturer, Student Adviser,
Faculty of Education,
Building 902, Room 159
Monash University, Berwick campus
Phone: 9904 7171

On 4 October 2013 09:17, mike cole <lchcmike@gmail.com> wrote:

Go for it, Andy

On Thursday, October 3, 2013, Andy Blunden wrote:

I'd be interested in collaborating in constructing a Wiki section on CHAT
terms, Mike. And I would add to your list:
Action, Behaviour, Artefact, Mediation, Activity, Situation (apart from
SSD), Consciousness, Matter and Concept.

*Andy Blunden*

mike cole wrote:

Bruce is asking about absence of email on xmca. I have sent a couple of
message, but of course do not
see them except later on the accumulated list.

What's new? There sure are a lot of you out there. Hit  reply and say
something about what you
are working on or wondering about.

For example, I have been fussing over vocabulary confusions in a course
that I visit in Colorado taught by
Kris G.  Learning, development, practice, zoped, social situation of
development, context...... how are they related in Vygotky's theory??
questions like that.

And you??

Status: O