[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Xmca-l] Re: Polysemy of "Community"
- To: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: [Xmca-l] Re: Polysemy of "Community"
- From: Andy Blunden <email@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 15:49:48 +1000
- In-reply-to: <413D4535-202D-40BD-B04C-51F9C939DE44@hawaii.edu>
- List-archive: <https://mailman.ucsd.edu/mailman/private/xmca-l>
- List-help: <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=help>
- List-id: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca-l.mailman.ucsd.edu>
- List-post: <mailto:email@example.com>
- List-subscribe: <https://mailman.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca-l>, <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <https://mailman.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca-l>, <mailto:email@example.com?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <C19012EF8F8F7146898DA221E3E7F8E1013B0ED8774B@MAIL2.bgsu.edu> <393FDE85-EFCF-48E6-96E0-6ED970A4DD80@hawaii.edu> <CAGaCnpwV-LJiup9qyOOXP=TPX6NCQk+4R_GSNxJg8+CU14OrOQ@mail.gmail.com> <E478F7B8-EDCF-4519-B616-E17C2ED214B8@hawaii.edu> <C19012EF8F8F7146898DA221E3E7F8E1013B0ED877E0@MAIL2.bgsu.edu> <520AE206.firstname.lastname@example.org> <677393EE-FCF8-4A94-8F11-E2922F308E28@hawaii.edu> <520AFF6D.email@example.com> <94019118-330E-4A70-8FC5-AC7186A4331C@hawaii.edu> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <520B1DB2.email@example.com> <CAHCnM0D_dAotUMAWvzjSCWACptCs4QprkmgwVUzMMYaJE64OBA@mail.gmail.com> <520C4499.firstname.lastname@example.org> <9C3E0B46-1122-49B6-86B8-3E1AE8B1C016@hawaii.edu> <520C5629.email@example.com> <413D4535-202D-40BD-B04C-51F9C939DE44@hawaii.edu>
- Reply-to: firstname.lastname@example.org, "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <email@example.com>
- Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org
- User-agent: Thunderbird 184.108.40.206 (Windows/20090812)
We are at a point of real technicalities now, Cliff. But anyway ...
You say that we can "only assume" the independent existence of a
material world "through our activity." I think "only assume" is a tad
understated, though I don't want to rehearse the arguments against
subjective idealism here. It is certainly true that what we know about
it we know only thanks to and through our activity. Vygotsky was most
certainly of the view that the material world existed independently of
our activity through which it is endowed with meaning. ("Historical
Meaning etc ...." s. 13)
My point is that we cannot restrict ourselves to Activity, to the extent
that we marginalise the significance of the objective existence of the
artefacts mediating the actions making up activity or the actions
themselves. The material conditions of life (including the human body)
are an essential, irreducible part of human life. And that requires not
just a nod, but real attention.
But let's move on. Cliff, the meaning you attach to
"*intersubjectivity*" is not one I have come across in CHAT. For CHAT
writers, "intersubjectivity" simply refers to the sum total of
interactions between individuals, not any particular state or attributes
of that process. What does it mean for you?
Cliff O'Donnell wrote:
That's an alternative way to go, Cliff, define "community" by "shared
meanings," but the upshot of that way is the counter-intuitive
conclusion that kids and their parents belong to different "cultural
Many do. And many kids (teens) and their parents, but far from
all, would not find that counter-intuitive given their experience.
There is one point which I must clarify though from your last words
below: "The material form of an artifact may be universal in the
sense that we may all agree on the label for it. However, the
artifact may have very different meanings for us." No. The artefacts
have a universal material form despite us having "different labels"
for it. The foundation of natural science is that matter exist
independently of human activity, obedient to natural laws which are
knowable. And natural science has a right to exist; it is not a giant
Sure, although we can only assume that through our human activity
(including the means that leads to natural laws).
We *do* of course ascribe different meanings to one and the same
material form or object, but that is thanks to human activity.
Exactly. And isn't human activity what is of most importance to
us? (Including the human activity that may affect the natural world).
The matter exists independently of our interpretation of it. This is
why I know I can rely on artefacts to provide a sound, universal
foundation for "community," and I leave it entirely open that a
multiplicity of meanings and actions are in conflict within the
But your "sound, universal foundation" is built on the meanings
you have for those artifacts.