[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[xmca] Microcosm and Unit
- To: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: [xmca] Microcosm and Unit
- From: Andy Blunden <email@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 01:48:02 +1100
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=2007001; d=ucsd.edu; c=simple; q=dns; b=pD+CvZi9WR2CKRIzPSWZLez59wGXhcb9Z9YuU8xOSrd/7DqsPGhzNHoBvlTQSGiIk d05TH9ORrgcRQF3Fsj1Yw==
- In-reply-to: <8532C99A9BB54491BCD8982C1101AEA5@koky128049>
- List-archive: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/private/xmca>
- List-help: <mailto:email@example.com?subject=help>
- List-id: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca.weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-post: <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>
- List-subscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:email@example.com?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <20090221040350.1FA941B983A@weber.ucsd.edu> <8532C99A9BB54491BCD8982C1101AEA5@koky128049>
- Reply-to: email@example.com, "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Sender: email@example.com
- User-agent: Thunderbird 126.96.36.199 (Windows/20080421)
Checking for other instances in which Vygotsky mentions the
"When our Marxists explain the Hegelian principle in Marxist
methodology they rightly claim that each thing can be
examined as a microcosm, as a universal measure in which the
whole big world is reflected. On this basis they say that to
study one single thing, one subject, one phenomenon *8until
the end*, *exhaustively*, means to know the world in all its
connections. In this sense it can be said that each person
is to some degree a measure of the society, or rather class,
to which he belongs, for the whole totality of social
relationships is reflected in him." (Ch 13, Crisis)
I take this to mean a deep study of just one thing, if
carried right through, brings out everything, because of the
infinite interconnection of all phenomena. The specialist
must perforce become a generalist if they are to carry
through to the end. "Destroy one grain of dust and you
destroy the universe."
"We showed that a generalised reflection of reality is the
basic characteristic of words. This aspect of the word
brings us to the threshold of a wider and deeper subject –
the general problem of consciousness. Thought and language,
which reflect reality in a way different from that of
perception, are the key to the nature of human
consciousness. Words play a central part not only in the
development of thought but in the historical growth of
consciousness as a whole. A word is a microcosm of human
consciousness." (end ch 7 Thinking and Speaking)
I take this in the same way: if you can thoroughly
understand how words operate in human life then you will
have solved all the essential problems.
On this basis, I agree with Nikolai, that "microcosm" and
"unit of analysis" have quite different meanings. I would be
inclined to anyway, as I do not believe that "word meaning"
can be a unit of analysis for consciousness.
But if "tool mediated action" *were* to be taken as a unit
of analysis for consciousness (which I have reservations
about, but this claim has a long pedigree in CHAT), then it
is very fair to say, well let's look at one kind of tool -
words - which play such an important role in human life, and
one action - meaning - and if we can solve this one, we've
solved all the key problems, and the rest is easy.
I am inclined to think that Marx and Ilyenkov's join
obsession with value as a material ideal is similar.
Understand how value works as an ideal, and you will have
unlocked the lot. And what about Pavlov's dog?
Nikolai Veresov wrote:
Nikolai-- I did not understand the message below. Might you expand,
it requires explaining some deep philosophical issues to us? We are
mutual understanding here, not winning arguments or splitting hairs.
Just change the subject line so that we do not get pages of repetition
we can get from the xmca archive. For example -- Microcosm vs unit of
Dear Mike. Thank you for the reply.
1/ I did not want to bring any kind of mess of disorder to the high
respected MCA community. I just wanted to get an answer to my question
"Where Vygotsky speaks on the word meaning as the unit of analysis of
human consciousness?" Who else if not Vygotskians can do it? I am
working on the paper about this at the moment and I just wanted to know
the opinions in the community. The answer I have got is not about unit
but about the word meaning as microcosm.
2/ It was not my intention to discuss my paper on Marxism or the
professors dresses in South Korea. I do not know how to react on
criticisms of David and Ulvi even though the reaction is needed in such
kind of discourse.
3/ I did not have in mind any "winning arguments" or "splitting hairs".
If my questions bring such an impression I prefer to return to my status
of the reader of this mailing list discussions, not the active participant.
I apologise for inconveniences.
xmca mailing list
Andy Blunden http://home.mira.net/~andy/ +61 3 9380 9435
Hegel's Logic with a Foreword by Andy Blunden:
xmca mailing list