[Xmca-l] Re: Question on an abstract notion

[Christopher Schuck]

Everyone: my email has been hacked and may be circulating a fake Google
Drive link; please do not click on it!!

So sorry.....sending to all three threads.

Chris Schuck

On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Andy Blunden <ablunden@mira.net> wrote:

> https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/us/stewart.htm
> This is the Introduction to "Hegel Myths and Legends."
> Unfortunately, Stewart propagates a couple of Marx myths and legends in
> the process of compiling a passably good expose of Hegel myths and legends.
> Andy
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Andy Blunden
> http://home.mira.net/~andy
> http://www.brill.com/products/book/origins-collective-decision-making
> On 25/04/2016 1:54 AM, Lplarry wrote:
>
>>
>> Andy,
>>
>> Is there no merit then in this notion of abstraction as a moment that may
>> potentially become concretely actualized or realized ?
>>
>> Andy  is there an article that can unfold how this myth historically
>> developed?
>>
>> My growing edge.
>>
>> Sent from my Windows 10 phone
>>
>> *From: *Andy Blunden <mailto:ablunden@mira.net>
>> *Sent: *April 24, 2016 8:31 AM
>> *To: *xmca-l@mailman.ucsd.edu <mailto:xmca-l@mailman.ucsd.edu>
>> *Subject: *[Xmca-l] Re: Question on an abstract notion
>>
>> That Hegel used "Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis" is a myth, Larry.
>>
>> Andy
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Andy Blunden
>>
>> http://home.mira.net/~andy
>>
>> http://www.brill.com/products/book/origins-collective-decision-making
>>
>> On 25/04/2016 1:06 AM, Lplarry wrote:
>>
>> > Hegel begins with a high abstraction as a thesis statement. Then moves
>> to antithesis, arriving at a more *concrete* synthesis. This as the
>> movement towards form and structure and order.
>>
>> >
>>
>> > If this is accurate then I want to begin here with a high abstraction.
>>
>> >
>>
>> > Being is not self-identity but rather self-differentiation. The
>> opposite of being (thesis) is not non-being or negation, but rather the
>> *absence* of negation (uniformity or indifference).
>>
>> >
>>
>> > I will pause here, at this height of high abstraction as a speculation
>> without grounding. Does this abstraction have any merit?
>>
>> > If this notion/speculation as high abstraction does have any potency,
>> this abstraction will need to *travel* towards  *concrete* actualization
>> and realization as a movement of *becoming* (movement of synthesis).
>>
>> >
>>
>> > First my inquiry  concerning this high abstracted question exploring
>> the notion of being &*absence* of being (uniformity) as *indifference*.
>>
>> > Living experience (as) asymmetrical (not symmetrical uniformity).
>>
>> > Therefore the need for *modulation* within living experience.
>>
>> >
>>
>> >
>>
>> >
>>
>> > Sent from my Windows 10 phone
>>
>> >
>>
>> >
>>
>>
>