[Xmca-l] Re: Thought and language as oscillating and pulsing [or not]

[greg.a.thompson@gmail.com]

Thanks for this Martin. A lovely explanation that helps me to see how questions of ontology naturally flow out of phenomenology (something that many anthropologists doing ontology and/or phenomenology have missed!).

I also noticed remarkable resonances between etienne and mikes mind the gap paper and Sartre's argument locating freedom in the gap between the perception of the thing and our awareness of our perception of the thing. It makes sense but I hadn't thought of mike and etienne's paper in this relation before.
Cheers,
Greg

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jan 25, 2015, at 7:15 PM, Martin John Packer <mpacker@uniandes.edu.co> wrote:
> 
> This time, the BBC has come up with quite a good discussion of phenomenology, from Husserl to Heidegger and onwards (though not to Spet, unfortunately)!
> 
> <http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b04ykk4m>
> 
> Martin
> 
>> On Jan 24, 2015, at 10:19 PM, Annalisa Aguilar <annalisa@unm.edu> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Martin,
>> 
>> I would be interested in the "intro to Husserl" by Shpet, as I have long been curious how the Husserl got to LSV.
>> 
>> Is it possible/doable to get some scans of chapter(s) from Appearance & Sense? you know, the ones you believe to be most juicy?
>> 
>> You may at any time hermeneutically determine what is "most juicy."
>> 
>> Kind regards,
>> 
>> Annalisa
> 
>