[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Xmca-l] Re: Black Underachievement, etc.
- To: "Dr. Paul C. Mocombe" <pmocombe@mocombeian.com>
- Subject: [Xmca-l] Re: Black Underachievement, etc.
- From: Andy Blunden <ablunden@mira.net>
- Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 11:25:38 +1100
- Cc: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca-l@mailman.ucsd.edu>, <Cecile.Wright@nottingham.ac.uk>, carol Tomlin <info@caroltomlin.com>
- In-reply-to: <4t40wi6c08yecp34352cp5rp.1383605441092@email.android.com>
- List-archive: <https://mailman.ucsd.edu/mailman/private/xmca-l>
- List-help: <mailto:xmca-l-request@mailman.ucsd.edu?subject=help>
- List-id: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca-l.mailman.ucsd.edu>
- List-post: <mailto:xmca-l@mailman.ucsd.edu>
- List-subscribe: <https://mailman.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca-l>, <mailto:xmca-l-request@mailman.ucsd.edu?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <https://mailman.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca-l>, <mailto:xmca-l-request@mailman.ucsd.edu?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <4t40wi6c08yecp34352cp5rp.1383605441092@email.android.com>
- Reply-to: <ablunden@mira.net>, "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca-l@mailman.ucsd.edu>
- Sender: <xmca-l-bounces@mailman.ucsd.edu>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
I think the fundamental flaw of this approach, Paul, is that it takes as
its fundamental units, entities which are unchanging. Yes, an ideology
is by definition, self-sustaining and self-justifying. But, while it is
true that history is littered with disasters, and the critical periods
of social change are indeed marked by catastrophe, these crtitical
phases are prepared and constituted by phases of lytical change and are
inseparable from them. This general character of development teaches us
that it is a mistake to separate lytical and critical phases of
development. I think that in order to grasp social life as essential
lysubject to change, development and transformation, one must take as a
fundamental unit of analysis something which is inherently a process of
development. I use "project", others simply call it "an activity".
Andy
http://www.academia.edu/2365533/Collaborative_Project_as_a_Concept_for_Interdisciplinary_Human_Science_Research
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Andy Blunden*
http://home.mira.net/~andy/
Dr. Paul C. Mocombe wrote:
Andy,
Unfortunately, I am in agreement with althusser. I cannot think of
one historical case to prove the contrary. It is necessary for one
historical frame to replace another via catastrophe and revolution.
Can we truly say that the middle class represents an alternative to
the dominant ideology of the upper-class of owners and high-level
executives? I do not think say. Just the same, the argument you
raise is tantamount to the hybridity discourse of homi bhabha...and I
am in agreement with spivak, hybridity is not an alternative to the
discourse of the colonizer...it is using the discourse of the
colonizer to convict them of not identifying with their logic, which
the colonized accepts and reproduces. This is not liberating, nor
does it offer an alternative to the discourse of the colonizer.
Dr. Paul C. Mocombe