Hello,
Nowadays the most famous representative of action research is
Stephen Kemmis and he has keen interest on system theory.
For Finnish members of the list: Stephen Kemmis is coming to next
"Kasvatustieteen päivät" in Jyväskylä.
Rauno
-----Original Message-----
From: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu
[mailto:xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu] On Behalf Of Lubomir Savov Popov
Sent: 22. toukokuuta 2013 5:44
To: lchcmike@gmail.com; eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity
Subject: RE: [xmca] A question about Lewin & CHAT& Engestrom
I personally have looked in all these areas regarding the
theoretical and methodological needs of design programming and
building users research. The situation there might be quite
different from the fields of human development and education.
Action Research from an activity theory position should be conceived
as project-specific research. Research that is intended to bring
information for project/design decision-making. As a social
scientist, Lewin makes a great conceptual leap to envisage science
as a component of engineering (of social situations). However, from
the other end of the continuum, from design and engineering
practice, it is very easy to see the need for project-specific
research. We can see examples of project-specific research in R&D
(Research and Development).
I personally use activity theory as a methodological instrument in
project-specific research. Activity Theory has assimilated systems
thinking and ecological/contextual thinking as well.
One example of Lewinian thinking operationalized to action-relevant
concepts is the behavior setting (Roger Barker). I would also like
to mention here Bronfenbrenner for his more courageous introduction
of systems thinking. The behavior setting concept is well known in
environment and behavior research. However, with my preference to
"activity" over "behavior," I am tempted to offer a similar concept
-- "activity setting." I strongly believe that the theoretical
apparatus of "activity" has a number of methodological advantages
over "behavior."
With kind regards,
Lubomir
Lubomir Popov, Ph.D.
School of Family and Consumer Sciences
American Culture Studies affiliated faculty
309 Johnston Hall,
Bowling Green, Ohio 43403-0059
Lspopov@bgsu.edu
419.372.7935
-----Original Message-----
From: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu
[mailto:xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu] On Behalf Of mike cole
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 9:46 PM
To: eXtended Mind, Culture,Activity
Subject: [xmca] A question about Lewin & CHAT& Engestrom
A former colleague sent this comment/question to me and I thought I
would pass it along.
I responded that there was a lot of interaction between Lewin,
Vygotsky, Luria and ......., but I could not speak for later users
of CHAT.
Sort of fyi.
mike
-----------
One thought has emerged from my current reading to come up with
theories to inform methodology: I am curious as to why CHAT
researchers had never seemed to look into Kurt Lewin's Action
Research and Field Theory as tools to think about. For example, what
I see Engeström is calling "Expansive learning" looks to my eye to
be quite close to Lewin's freeze-unfreeze-freeze model, and to this
standard change management model, in which we are looking (I think)
at a fairly typical model of an object in the world of software
products, in which external forces (which I would call activity
systems) are interacting with an object that is evolving through the
interaction of such systems:
Software installation, tuning, management and upgrade is very much
like this. The object mutates in response to its environment,
interacting with multiple interactive communities, as customers use
the tool and discover new things they wish it would do, or
developers think of interesting things that can be done with the
tool, in response to an environment of new tools and other
developer's objects. The shared object changes in response to those
goals (or is dumped--not that this would ever happen with
*my*company's objects) for an object that looks like it can better
reward the effort to shape it into goals that may not be fully
grasped, but that become real in the interaction of users,
developers, communities, and goals.
I suppose Lewin's focus on the individual in society, rather than on
action in society, is a theoretical barrier. But they both work for me
__________________________________________
_____
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
__________________________________________
_____
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca