[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [xmca] "semiotic/semantic [semicheskyj] analysis". Can you help me?
- To: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- Subject: RE: [xmca] "semiotic/semantic [semicheskyj] analysis". Can you help me?
- From: Rauno Huttunen <rakahu@utu.fi>
- Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 08:43:28 +0000
- Accept-language: fi-FI, en-US
- Delivered-to: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
- In-reply-to: <SNT145-W17E28BAFBC0D3399EC5AB592B40@phx.gbl>
- List-archive: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/private/xmca>
- List-help: <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=help>
- List-id: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca.weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-post: <mailto:xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-subscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <CAHCnM0BHoaQUnpnnbLuJBmQdxC1y=WaZVKsAfHDcw5-4FzH6kw@mail.gmail.com> <02196276-203B-4133-8090-437F0CF0E7AE@duq.edu> <CAHCnM0AsFqcVdr3bh8JZOWm=2c_PBGRuDuWTkLVfGuAZvRkazw@mail.gmail.com> <C94EC366-4968-486F-ADB9-3805110713F5@duq.edu> <CAHCnM0DeVAFXmA=Yjp4F-i4aPXyL+mfoCPymS8ZN3m2HDzjQdQ@mail.gmail.com> <4D9DA02D-7F20-42F9-90B5-2F087E6601CB@duq.edu> <1366021811.8360.YahooMailNeo@web172304.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <E2C34E54-9F51-4A2F-A5E1-D27BA97DFEF8@duq.edu> <1366119959.30530.YahooMailNeo@web172304.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <SNT145-W17E28BAFBC0D3399EC5AB592B40@phx.gbl>
- Reply-to: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- Sender: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu
- Thread-index: AQHOP9sZgMSf7tw4SU6mOLun++HKVpjjfA1A
- Thread-topic: [xmca] "semiotic/semantic [semicheskyj] analysis". Can you help me?
Hello,
You should not take Vygotsky's remark (the only adequate method for the study of the systemic and semantic structure of consciousness) so seriously. Nobody has invented a method which reveals the of structures of consciousness. The very concept of consciousness is both empirically and philosophically problematic. There is no single method that would reveal the secrets of consciousness.
Rauno Huttunen
-----Original Message-----
From: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu [mailto:xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu] On Behalf Of Achilles Delari Junior
Sent: 23. huhtikuuta 2013 7:29
To: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
Subject: [xmca] "semiotic/semantic [semicheskyj] analysis". Can you help me?
Greetings for all,
Please, I understand that I have a major methodological problem in my nearest research project: "how to understand human making-sense through the concrete acts of a person's speech?". Along many years I had thought about Vygotsky's claim that ""Semiotic [and/or "semantic" = semicheskyj] analysis is the only adequate method for the study of the systemic and semantic structure of consciousness." (see http://www.marxists.org/archive/vygotsky/works/1934/problem-consciousness.htm). But it is not so clear how to proceed "Semiotic/semantic analysis". Then, if you pleased, could somebody help me, shining my mind about the (im)possibilities about somebody really learn *how to do* such kind of analysis? Here in Brazil, close to me, there is nobody working with something in this direction, then I have no local resources to ask for... Forgive me about the naive character of the question, but I really want to learn about.
Thank you very much, once more. Best wishes.
Achilles from Brazil.
__________________________________________
_____
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
__________________________________________
_____
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca