[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[xmca] Re: The Fox and the Crow
- To: kellogg <kellogg59@hanmail.net>
- Subject: [xmca] Re: The Fox and the Crow
- From: mike cole <lchcmike@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 07:54:50 -0700
- Cc: "eXtended Mind, Culture,Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- Delivered-to: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=xdJXdZvDxsM9ucLpwOZhc1caFtWnvsvivP1O31B0Q7w=; b=U4In7tMrhEsy7iog+leP22raMoe/dR4ukBV2KsP3uNBuKgBn30bXBJVxNRdfkwdy3d 8qjoabaaEdRCqlSGXmk7GZrXOvDqyKVKhkta1HUD0EuY3kieCTJ9YIxuhFq46Tf7lNLF lA0kFoFf4GXrM4fyuXPocU70FoDHXCl6P+CtiW/Ix+nlFlpPx5pxXX8PxJBK6Bs5dUh6 1pIvdWpQx4cUuRQIiN06IlYwOi41NEBDuc1m6aFkg+9gGorwAGKp2dq7gcWTaYjsX52f 7RJ/nzGMc0CxFYCZBWH7wQW3qLxY2FZ9KJgKWxqxfuAXOJ5JdnL3G6KAkUmSncbgHSce vI5g==
- In-reply-to: <20120720130323.HM.b0000000008eGFJ@kellogg59.wwl1642.hanmail.net>
- List-archive: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/private/xmca>
- List-help: <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=help>
- List-id: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca.weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-post: <mailto:xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-subscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <20120720130323.HM.b0000000008eGFJ@kellogg59.wwl1642.hanmail.net>
- Reply-to: lchcmike@gmail.com, "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- Sender: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu
Clever poem by K&K (wink). How does it relate to Austin's idea of
illocutionary force?
mike
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 9:03 PM, kellogg <kellogg59@hanmail.net> wrote:
> I've been chewing over Greg's rather brilliant comment that Austin's
> idea about illocutionary force is basically magical. I would say it is less
> a folk view of speech than a child's view, Greg; speech is background noise
> for gettin' stuff done.
>
>
>
> Geertz says--you know, in the opening essay in 'The Interpretation of
> Culture' where he talks about 'thick description' and that Maghrebi sheep
> trader with the improbable name of Cohen--that our objective descriptions
> of 'gettin' stuff done' very often cannot discern the wink in the blink.
>
>
>
> Lately I've been translating those Krylov fables that Vygotsky talks about
> so much in "Psychology of Art" into English. It turns out they are really
> very winky and not very blinky. Here, for example, is what I've got for the
> Fox and the Crow:
>
> **
>
> *Folks say foxy talk is bad*
>
> *Happy words can make us sad.*
>
> *Do we really hate them so? *
>
> * *
>
> *Words are kindly. Words are smart.*
>
> *But the gut speaks through the heart.*
>
> *Hearts will sing...and heads will know. *
>
> * *
>
> *Look! A crow sees chunks of cheese.*
>
> *So she takes them to the trees.*
>
> *And she sits there with her treat.*
>
> * *
>
> *See! A fox can smell the cheese.*
>
> *Now he’s coming through the trees.*
>
> *There’s the crow, about to eat.*
>
> * *
>
> *Foxy sees. And Foxy speaks.*
>
> *“Such black feathers! Such white cheeks!*
>
> *What a lovely pair of wings!”*
>
> * *
>
> *“What red lips and what a beak!*
>
> *If I wait here, she will speak. *
>
> *I can’t wait until she sings!”*
>
> * *
>
> Now this crow is not so dumb
>
> But she’s lonely. And he’s come
>
> All this way to sit and hear.
>
>
>
> So she smiles. And she caws.
>
> Cheese falls into Foxy’s jaws--
>
> Cheese and Foxy disappear.
>
>
>
> Now, I admit, I've taken a few liberties with Krylov--his raven is not
> quite the half believing, half knowing female that my crow is. But a nod is
> as good as a wink (to a blind horse).
>
>
>
> David Kellogg
>
> Hankuk University of Foreign Studies
>
>
>
> <kellogg59@hanmail.net>
__________________________________________
_____
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca