To Mark Here are short clarifications Scaffolding can be defined as a way of promoting learning within ZPD using system of means: mediators, language, shared (teacher or other person-student) activity. Dynamic assessment (DA) can be defined as process A- teaching =obuchenie (using scaffolding) -A. Attached are my papers on promoting autonomy for new (foreign or second) language learners and on affective factors in SLL. Bella Kotik-Friedgut On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 5:45 AM, Mark de Boer <mark.yomogi@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I've been doing a lot of reading on interaction in a tool-mediated learning > environment and have begun to read specifically on different forms of > assessment. In the second language acquisition classroom, I've been > examining scaffolding, formative and summative assessment as well as > dynamic assessment. > > These forms of assessment are very much different, but there is literature > which suggests that scaffolding is similar in many ways to dynamic > assessment. I'm not in agreement with this, but I'm attempting to figure a > way to decipher the differences not theoretically, but in the classroom > (there are enough convincing arguments in the literature to help me > differentiate between scaffolding and dynamic assessment). > > Putting that aside for the moment, I've encountered the word obuchenie > before through this list and also in some of the literature, and I'm not > sure how to define obuchenie with respect with dynamic assessment. I'm > convinced that they are one in the same. > > Looking for some guidance. > > Best, > > Mark > __________________________________________ > _____ > xmca mailing list > xmca@weber.ucsd.edu > http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca > -- Sincerely yours Bella Kotik-Friedgut
Attachment:
ELIT12 Kotik.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
Attachment:
Kotikmot-affcomplex.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
__________________________________________ _____ xmca mailing list xmca@weber.ucsd.edu http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca