RE: [xmca] Smolucha - pronunciation/genealogy (Systems of functions & Aristotelian concepts)

[Colette Murphy <c.a.murphy@qub.ac.uk>]

Wow Peter - the article uses the same observation! I look forward to reading it too - thanks!
Colette

Dr Colette Murphy
Senior Lecturer
School of Education
69 University St
Queen's University
Belfast BT7 1HL

tel: 02890975953

“Why is it, in spite of the fact that teaching by pouring in, learning by passive absorption, are universally condemned, that they are still so entrenched in practice?”
                                                                                    John Dewey Democracy in Education 1916, Page 46
________________________________________
From: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu [xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu] On Behalf Of Peter Smagorinsky [smago@uga.edu]
Sent: 22 June 2012 13:59
To: eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity
Subject: RE: [xmca] Smolucha - pronunciation/genealogy (Systems of functions    &       Aristotelian concepts)

Mike et al., the attached article has helped me with Dewey's question. It's not a cultural-historical theory in the Vygotskian sense, but situates teaching practice culturally and historically nonetheless. p

-----Original Message-----
From: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu [mailto:xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu] On Behalf Of mike Cole
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 8:52 AM
To: eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity
Cc: eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity
Subject: Re: [xmca] Smolucha - pronunciation/genealogy (Systems of functions & Aristotelian concepts)

What is the answer to Dewey's question, Colette? That very question has been on my mind for Zoe time.
Mike

On Jun 22, 2012, at 5:21 AM, Colette Murphy <c.a.murphy@qub.ac.uk> wrote:

> Thanks to Martin, Anton and everyone else involved in this discussion - it helps enormously with issues realting to 'higher psychological functions'!
> Colette
>
>
> Dr Colette Murphy
> Senior Lecturer
> School of Education
> 69 University St
> Queen's University
> Belfast BT7 1HL
>
> tel: 02890975953
>
> “Why is it, in spite of the fact that teaching by pouring in, learning by passive absorption, are universally condemned, that they are still so entrenched in practice?”
>
> John Dewey Democracy in Education 1916, Page 46
> ________________________________________
> From: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu [xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu] On
> Behalf Of Martin Packer [packer@duq.edu]
> Sent: 22 June 2012 13:18
> To: Anton Yasnitsky; eXtended Mind, Culture,  Activity
> Subject: Re: [xmca] Smolucha - pronunciation/genealogy (Systems of
> functions &  Aristotelian concepts)
>
> Here is the text that Anton and Michael have been referring to.
>
> Martin
>
>
> On Jun 21, 2012, at 10:09 PM, Anton Yasnitsky wrote:
>
>> Andy,
>>
>>
>> I regard mediation etc.pretty vague and, therefore, virtually
>> meaningless. Also I regard the whole research program of Vygotsky Circle of their instrumental period of 1920s mechanistic indeed, and this conclusion I borrow primarily from Vygotsky's own texts in which he severely criticized their own ideas of that period.
>>
>>
>> Finally, yes, I do find the sharp separation of all psychological
>> functions (whatever this means) into either the higher or the lower
>> binary, rigid, valuative, and pretty much Aristotelian,
>>
>> in Lewin's terminology. Under Lewin's strong influence Vygotsky
>> realized the flaw in his conceptual system and made a serious effort
>> at making the transition from
>>
>> Aristotelian to Galileian in his own thinking, but, quite unfortunately, by the time this transition in many respects was made, he did not have too much time to  live:
>>
>> a couple of years, not more. Which is a pity, indeed.
>>
>>
>> AY
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Andy Blunden <ablunden@mira.net>
>> To: Anton Yasnitsky <the_yasya@yahoo.com>; "eXtended Mind, Culture,
>> Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
>> Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 10:58:37 PM
>> Subject: Re: [xmca] Smolucha - pronunciation/genealogy (Systems of
>> functions)
>>
>> So Anton, you regard mediation of psychlogical functions by cultural artefacts as "mechanistic" and "binary"?
>> Andy
>>
>> Anton Yasnitsky wrote:
>>> Martin,
>>>
>>> Right, this is exactly my point: much criticized for fairly mechanistic distinction between the lower and the higher in his earlier work of 1920s, Vygotsky rejected this binary opposition in his later writings of the 1930, although he kept using  phrases "higher functions" or, rather, "higher processes" and the like.
>> __________________________________________
>> _____
>> xmca mailing list
>> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
>> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
> __________________________________________
> _____
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
> __________________________________________
> _____
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
__________________________________________
_____
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca

__________________________________________
_____
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca