These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
True and thanks for a copy, but there is no evidence (as of now) whether Flavell new and was utilizing any of Vygotsky in his paper of 1966, -- is there? ... But, frankly, who cares, after all :) AY ________________________________ From: Martin Packer <packer@duq.edu> To: Anton Yasnitsky <the_yasya@yahoo.com>; "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu> Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2012 8:43:07 PM Subject: Re: [xmca] empirical evidence (Kohlberg et al., 1968 testing Vygotsky) But Flavell had presented a paper on the same topic 4 years earlier, and was credited in a footnote. On Jun 24, 2012, at 7:38 PM, Anton Yasnitsky wrote: > For Vygotsky, Kohlberg, of Harvard, certainly would not need mediation of Flavell: the book had come out in 1962, and was orchestrated by the bunch of guys at Harvard, > which clearly was a stronghold of Vygotsky's admirers back then, i.e. in 1960s and 1970s. __________________________________________ _____ xmca mailing list xmca@weber.ucsd.edu http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca