This dispatch on US education reform and the powers that be landed on my
Facebook page last night: "Why the Ed Department should be reconceived -
or abolished" - by Peter Smagorinsky
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/post/why-the-ed-department-should-be-reconceived--or-abolished/2012/03/09/gIQAHfdB5R_blog.html
An educator on education policy, in the public sphere! More of this please.
One excerpt:
"Instead of having a highly centralized administration powered by money
contributed by textbook publishers and other entrepreneurs cashing in on
the lucrative enterprise of educational materials production, I would have
a *highly distributed approach*** in which most decision-making is local
and includes — and indeed, relies on — the perspective of teachers.
Presently, there’s little reason for practicing teachers to<http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/post/five-ways-school-reform-is-hurting-teacher-quality/2012/03/08/gIQAHUMK3R_blog.html>keep up with the latest ideas emerging from credible sources, or to engage
in the process of producing those ideas and becoming credible sources
themselves. The approach that I suggest would lend urgency to the need for
teachers to be informed in order to make sound decisions. It would place a
premium on being a reflective practitioner who is attentive to classroom
processes and student learning, because such observations would become part
of the broader school conversation about how to best educate the students
who attend the school."
***emphasis added* because I (as a citizen, not just educator) would love
to hear more about this especially.
Anthony
__________________________________________
_____
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca