[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xmca] Death and dying
Greg
I don't have an answer to your question:
Is there a tension here between the gap filling that Etienne and
Mike describe as something that we do all the time and what Bateson seems
to be suggesting about a (preferred) gapless world? Am I headed in endless
circles here or is there an interesting question at this particular
intersection? Or is my way of linking both of these positions filling in
(or not) too many gaps?
BUT I happen to "believe" [or intuit?] that the answer or to your question
IS CENTRAL and fundamental to many other questions being explored here AT
THIS PARTICULAR INTERSECTION.
Greg, Corey is also exploring different modes of "gap filling" through the
senses of vision, hearing, and touch and how these relate to the gap
creation and gap filling of linguistic knowing. Corey proposes that all
modalities [mediums??] express different constellations of sace-time
configurations. This brings in Merleau-Ponty's awareness that each of
these various modes of experiencing is ACTIVELY AND SPONTANEOUSLY
INTEGRATED. Each mode [power in Corey's terms] fortifies, supplements, and
intercommunicates with the other modes of perceiving.
Merleau-Ponty writes "The senses intercommunicate by OPENING on to the
structure of things. One sees the hardness and brittleness of glass, and
when, with a tinkling sound, it breaks, this sound is CONVEYED by the
visible glass."
Corey Anton in summarizing M-P's position writes,
"We integratively attend to what our powers release and appropriate; we do
not experience separate and distinct contributions from hearing, from
seeing, from touching, from SPEAKING. We do not separately attend to the
FIELD of any one, experiencing its power to the exclusion of the
others.....each sense is not experienced in isolation and then summed the
others into something called "experience" Thus, non-theoretical ABSORPTION
characterizes the modes and moments of PRE-THETIC intentionality. In sum,
we DO NOT, in isolation, gain actuality by touch, possibility by sight, and
interiority by hearing, world by discourse, etc." [Corey Anton, "discourse
as Care: A Phenomenological Consideration of Spatiality and Temporality"
HUMAN STUDIES, volume 25, pages 185-205, 2002]
Greg your question I believe is "spiralling" [not circling :-))]
It is a BIG question. It points toward the dilectical interplay between
"gaps" and "gap-filling" or in other words, the world as given and
the world as human gap creating [developing differentiation
and distanciation as moments within space/time and the spontaneous
PRE-THETIC gap filling at higher levels of integration]
Thanks for the article Bateson wrote for Korzybski's memorial.
Larry
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Greg Thompson <greg.a.thompson@gmail.com>wrote:
> There is a flipside to "gaps" that suggests that a gapless world. This
> position is nicely captured by Gregory Bateson (please forgive my
> transcription by intonation unit - Bateson's prose is hard to capture, but
> see link below for original):
>
> "The nature of
>
> the world in which I live
>
> and in which I wish you lived -
>
> all of you -
>
> and all the time -
>
> but even I don't live in it all the time.
>
> (solemnly) There are times,
>
> when I catch myself believing
>
> that there is such a thing as something
>
> which is separate from something else."
>
> And linking back to General Semantics (and Corey Anton is both affiliated
> with General Semantics and has written much on Bateson), Bateson was
> influenced by Korzybski (see Bateson's Korzybski memorial lecture at:
>
> http://www.generalsemantics.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/gsb-37-bateson.pdf
> and
> Bateson's quote above is taken from a blog announcing the new biographical
> movie of GB by Nora Bateson, the website can be seen at:
> http://www.bullfrogfilms.com/catalog/emind.html).
> And linking further back to Korzybski's view of why things go wrong in the
> world, Bateson writes that:
>
> "The major problems in the world are the result of the difference between
> how nature works and the way people think."
>
> It would seem that Bateson is pointing to gap-filling as the problem that
> creates the mismatch between word and world. Does that seem about right to
> others? Is there a tension here between the gap filling that Etienne and
> Mike describe as something that we do all the time and what Bateson seems
> to be suggesting about a (preferred) gapless world? Am I headed in endless
> circles here or is there an interesting question at this particular
> intersection? Or is my way of linking both of these positions filling in
> (or not) too many gaps?
>
> Thoughts?
> -greg
>
> p.s. C.S. Peirce, may have articulated a fuller conception in his notion of
> "synechism," but Bateson's is certainly more comprehensible and artful.
> Peirce's vision is a lot more difficult to take in. But I'd add that he has
> a wonderful notion of "self" that extends beyond the body and beyond life.
> We are "vicinities" "neighborhoods" rather than discretely bounded bodies.
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Larry Purss <lpscholar2@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Anthony
> >
> > The topic of death and the social formation of mind seems to be the
> > ultimate form of "gap & gap filling" which gives meaning to life. I'm
> > reading an article by Corey Anton titled "Beyond Theoretical Ethics:
> > Bakhtinian Anti-Theoreticism" [in Human Studies volume 24, pages 211-225;
> > 2001] This is what Corey has to say about death and our unique
> > once-occurant dwelling in the world.
> >
> > "The position that I am trying to make clear is that the human 'in
> general'
> > does not factually exist and that ethical considerations commonly posit a
> > general human: they posit a 'someone' who is ACTUALLY no one. In this
> > regard, their universality implicitly suggets that people are basically
> > interchangeable or not non-replaceable - not uniquely held by their place
> > in existence. The 'theoretical world is obtained through an essential
> and
> > fundamental abstraction from the factor of my unique being and from the
> > moral sense of that fact - AS IF I did not exist' (Bahktin). This
> > theoretical world can deeply mislead, for I never do not exist in my
> life;
> > I am never unnecessary or irrelevant, and it is only theoretical positing
> > that can make this seem to be so. (Leder) suggests that one's lived body
> '
> > is never just an object in the world but that very medium whereby our
> world
> > comes into being.' Thus, I may, in one sense, be simply one person among
> > other persons in the world that will go on without me AFTER MY DEATH.
> And
> > yet, I am, for me, that person who is never not there, that person who
> > somehow is ALWAYS co-given along with the world, and that person whose
> > world falls out of existence WITH MY DEATH. [page 215]
> >
> > Anthony, Corey is pointing to death as the ulimate "gap" and our
> humanness
> > as the process of gap-filling within our once-occurent unique cultural
> > historical existence. The social formation of mind develops through
> > differentiation and distanciation [gaps] AND the integrating
> [gap-filling]
> > ACTS (including theoretical acts) of our humanness.
> >
> > Larry
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:45 AM, ANTHONY M BARRA <tub80742@temple.edu>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for the resources, Huw and Andy.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Nektarios Alexi
> > > <NEKTARIOS.ALEXI@cdu.edu.au>wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thats an excellent book Huw!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu on behalf of Huw Lloyd
> > > > Sent: Wed 2/1/2012 9:43 PM
> > > > To: eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity
> > > > Subject: Re: [xmca] Death and dying
> > > >
> > > > Bakhtin's "Dostoevsky's Poetics" has a few indexed references.
> > > >
> > > > Huw
> > > >
> > > > On 31 January 2012 16:46, ANTHONY M BARRA <tub80742@temple.edu>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'm looking for Vygostky's, or Vygotskian, words on death and
> dying,
> > > > > especially terms of (but not limited to) "the social formation of
> > > mind,"
> > > > > and "mind extending beyond the skin."
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for any direction or help...
> > > > >
> > > > > Anthony
> > > > > __________________________________________
> > > > > _____
> > > > > xmca mailing list
> > > > > xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> > > > > http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
> > > > >
> > > > __________________________________________
> > > > _____
> > > > xmca mailing list
> > > > xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> > > > http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
> > > >
> > > > __________________________________________
> > > > _____
> > > > xmca mailing list
> > > > xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> > > > http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
> > > >
> > > __________________________________________
> > > _____
> > > xmca mailing list
> > > xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> > > http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
> > >
> > __________________________________________
> > _____
> > xmca mailing list
> > xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> > http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Gregory A. Thompson, Ph.D.
> Sanford I. Berman Post-Doctoral Scholar
> Department of Communication
> University of California, San Diego
> __________________________________________
> _____
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
__________________________________________
_____
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca