[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xmca] Ambivalence and system
- To: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <email@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [xmca] Ambivalence and system
- From: mike Cole <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 19:51:52 -0800
- Cc: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <email@example.com>
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date:to; bh=pRS/LjptraLGlz11W859xHvGyuK1b/Exh6vkHImehfc=; b=Heh6Ck3FdbLLLHMxETdnBNOqtgci+6reqq4EG+DwprcKdRPwTlJQ5jTW9dpqJKvTR7 pq9MA2VdOoD6Y7ZQkUUUbSdJOIrVtBS09rjdcBLOSLd71vD5x4Atk8EE7PHfMxJ7xQ7s M7SW83T9xYxWIc2Wl3YqEnwTLfBdzpHzXnsN0=
- In-reply-to: <CAGaCnpy3VEu4Pi3x8To7faGbxC6rh7iY6CVBSxVFfz-mK2FTbg@mail.gmail.com>
- List-archive: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/private/xmca>
- List-help: <mailto:email@example.com?subject=help>
- List-id: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca.weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-post: <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>
- List-subscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:email@example.com?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <CAGaCnpy3VEu4Pi3x8To7faGbxC6rh7iY6CVBSxVFfz-mK2FTbg@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <email@example.com>
- Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org
Romantic science, Larry?
On Nov 19, 2011, at 12:37 PM, Larry Purss <email@example.com> wrote:
> I wanted to reflect a little more on the centrality of ambivalence as
> inherent in all systemic conceptual worldviews by a backward glance to the
> tension between early German Romanticism and German Idealism.
> This is not an arena I know well but Andy's writings have clled me tlearn
> I am reading a book on Schlegel's contribution to the ideas circulating in
> Jena at the beginning of the 1800's. A time which has been referred to as
> Early German Romanticism.
> Schlegel wrote this comment when reflecting on thinking systematically.
> "It is equally fatal for the spirit to have a system and to have none. It
> will simply have to decide to combine the two"
> This comment seems to share the same sensibility as Zygmunt Bauman's notion
> of "ambivalence" as ontological to all system constructions. "liquid
> modernity" as diachronic versus more structural notions of solid modernity
> is a case in point.
> Every philosopher must have a system, for to make claims and construct
> arguments, we must assume some system, FOR WE NEED LIMITS, but this must be
> done with the recognition that ANY particular system is a PART of a
> PLURALITY of other systems. This is the recognition that one must
> simultaneouslly be WITHIN a system and be without it.
> This way of thinking, which can be framed as "romantic" [no final system]
> is also hermeneutic.
> Just further reflections on the ontological necessity of ambivalence at the
> heart of our projects.
> xmca mailing list
xmca mailing list