[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [xmca] The "Inner Form" of the Word



For whatever it might be worth to anybody by way of a testimonial:

After reading (& marking up) the first two chapters, I bought a second copy that I can keep clean for sharing pages, passages, etc.

On Sat, 28 May 2011, mike cole wrote:

Tony-- I have written to David to see if he has any texts, short of everyone
running out and buying his book (which I am sure he would not object to!),
that could guide our
discussion. His article in the Vygotsky companion ends with "in place of a
conclusion" and a warning not to cleanse Vygotsky of "rationalistic
tendencies."

Part of my unease in this discussion has been the binary nature of the terms
used, even as those using them believe in a basically trinary organization
of humaness.

mike

On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 8:23 AM, Tony Whitson <twhitson@udel.edu> wrote:

Thanks, Martin

 From a Peircean perspective, there seems to be a falsely exhaustive

dichotomy here between the ["laws of reason"]-logical and the
psycho-logical. The semio-logical is not reducible to either of those.

Again, I think that Bakhurst's _The Formation of Reason_ is very much on
point here. While he's not using Peirce, he is using Vygotsky et al. along
with the Bildung tradition, which is all about forming within culture, but
not [I would argue] as a matter of something merely psycho-logical.

__________________________________________
_____
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca