[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xmca] Teresa in Ecstasy
- To: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- Subject: Re: [xmca] Teresa in Ecstasy
- From: mike cole <lchcmike@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 17:46:32 -0700
- Cc:
- Delivered-to: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=KO87HlOlk7KGRfzssJm+yj6OHg9US0CzxWGekIQZgRI=; b=ARu7xp0X4wqo5J40PFBXtb8Gl80L++7xaxbIO/ja7G2sNUTNxx/CR+9E/cTqL/i2FB 0FRmfWUs7fNxyELdjT1ER6RBBkOTiaAQSBNiiLHmJB1i/YkMqjD4w89Bg7eVDCWAoGki OPvZego/uNQcEPPFQCw70VZt+i/MgvffP2izQ=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; b=AJqoqB+ejshds7TpPyUrecX/YNMlUiqqZbwdlOBcDaKSLJbH8kitMDxSYOpP1FHLC9 VXj/zVJ2fVHfDZc+GqkRyffrZOCHdNjFp+RXtQNkI290M7xi2IRCsSHr2qhy3fDz0hjR 4kaR1pNJQJCok3esCkYOGHRludPi9inHFFWks=
- In-reply-to: <657706.46492.qm@web110303.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
- List-archive: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/private/xmca>
- List-help: <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=help>
- List-id: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca.weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-post: <mailto:xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-subscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <657706.46492.qm@web110303.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
- Reply-to: lchcmike@gmail.com, "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- Sender: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu
The Russian is really hard, David. I think there may be an error with "ni"
in this triple negative phrase: что их никак нельзя *ни* понять.
Anton, Bella, Natalia? Karaul!!
mike
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 10:38 PM, David Kellogg <vaughndogblack@yahoo.com>wrote:
> On page 214 of Volume 6 of the Collected Works, we've got this:
>
> "If the naturalistic theory were simply to see the phenomena of holy or
> spiritual love, it would at the same time see from any facts pertaining to
> the sphere of vital love, that it could not in any way fail to understand
> them nor could it escape them."
>
> Which makes no sense at all in English. Here's the Russian:
>
>
> Если бы натуралистическая теория просто видела феномены святой или душевной
> любви, она бы вместе с тем видела, что их никак нельзя ни понять из любых
> фактов, относящихся к сфере витальной любви, ни вывести из них.
>
> Vygotsky is talking about the naturalistic theories of emotion (he has in
> mind reflexology, James-Lange, the theories which attempt to explain
> emotions as responses to physical sensations from eithe outside the body or
> inside it).
>
> I think what he is saying is that these theories either do NOT recognize
> the existence of spiritual love at all, or if they do (which of course James
> does in his lectures on the varieties of religious experience) they see no
> way of deriving spiritual love from the various manifestations of physical
> love.
>
> Well, Bernini did!
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecstasy_of_Saint_Theresa
>
> Vygotsky does say that the real purpose of descriptive psychology is to
> provide a scientific road down the same paths blazed by poets, painters,
> playwrights and novelists. But he should have added at least one sculptor!
>
>
> David Kellogg
> Seoul National University of Education
>
>
>
> __________________________________________
> _____
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
__________________________________________
_____
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca