[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xmca] Tom Toolery
- To: ablunden@mira.net, "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- Subject: Re: [xmca] Tom Toolery
- From: mike cole <lchcmike@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:08:57 -0700
- Cc:
- Delivered-to: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:reply-to :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=2Xkon01a0L1r/wkqD5yVny85kia4c5Vj0Rs52fsv2HU=; b=bhQ3v/3aaQENFMFfCBVOiMyXno0jaTFjbYIBLxBYX5rdsVJnMxmRtog4QLnsrQEwVm gdmSph4HAxrmAyiD4TfRz9hPNBsADcSMLkPNiEW3sSaJlaadsGOMntLsL6mdv3Xx5ilD oypHablXwkAALrEfHyjPwy8G1LJUxK8maWV7o=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; b=CdhOSSvfz+KihRzzztAJeSXRoc12edaFRRAPOXeorzLYW9uzoAiHAfNqMcvAI/9egJ fBFVtSyWd+HlOMM8ImOx6cqJKCSz/kWLiZJZc+VfrfeVPW7VJ4Zi/SfHmNFj2Bvs/8VL K9xacIw/oyv4gRx2bkpMqtwQW1QTjTk4BDUxo=
- In-reply-to: <4CBCFC4F.4050007@mira.net>
- List-archive: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/private/xmca>
- List-help: <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=help>
- List-id: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca.weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-post: <mailto:xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-subscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <762986.92382.qm@web110316.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <4CBCFC4F.4050007@mira.net>
- Reply-to: lchcmike@gmail.com, "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- Sender: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu
Well, David, hybridity is one of those words that gets extended
promiscuously.. one among many!
mike
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Andy Blunden <ablunden@mira.net> wrote:
> What would be an example of something which is ideal but not also material,
> David?
> andy
> David Kellogg wrote: ...
>
>> It seems to me that if we follow Steve and Ilyenkov, and we see problem
>> after problem as a matter of establishing the interaction of "ideal" and
>> "material", we will need some kind of super-category for the indivisible
>> whole which both ideal and material make up. Otherwise we really do fall
>> into the worst kind of Cartesian dualism. ...
>>
>>
>
>
> __________________________________________
>
> _____
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
__________________________________________
_____
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca