[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RE: [xmca] Emotions and culture
Hi Mabel
I'm glad you are injoying Stern's book.
I recently saw a book that was written exploring thr interface of gestalt psychology with relational perspectives. I will try to find it.
Your research and the tools you use to slow down and observe the microgenetic developmental moments with video and playback were not available to Vygotsky, so the information we now generate with freeze framing of video and film may give us a window into patterns of communication that were not available to Vygotsky. Of course our theories also influence what we perceive.
Larry
----- Original Message -----
From: Mabel Encinas <liliamabel@hotmail.com>
Date: Tuesday, December 1, 2009 1:59 pm
Subject: RE: [xmca] Emotions and culture
To: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
>
> Hi, Larry and all.
>
>
>
> Thank you very much Larry, for having introduced Stern. I am not
> into psychoanalysis. I am a Gestalt psychotherapist, and maybe
> because this perspective emphasizes the 'here and now', I
> realised that I had to discuss the present moment, and the
> performative making sense of the situation when I faced the
> challenge to analyse my videos about classroom interaction.
> Also, I discuss the difference of actions that seem
> intentionally loaded, with others in which intentionality is
> quite contestable. My research is based in microanalysis. For
> being able to study emotions, I decided to study Vygotsy's
> understanding of emotions. Also I found in this analysis of
> video (I did not interview neither the teachers or the students
> about their emotional experience, although I did had long
> conversations with the teachers), that in order to understand
> videos, there was important to find 'whole' situations in which
> emotions were first of all 'evident'. The segments then were
> from about 1 to 4 minutes long, and I then describe them in
> depth, including drawings of the interactions. I study this
> excerpts as developmental in terms of emotions. I already said
> that the metaphor I use is that I study certain threads without
> taking them away from the tissue. In my descriptions, I present
> the richness of the tissue and I relay in the concept of context
> that weave together (Cole, 1996). I discuss how emotions emerge
> and impact the situation, and how this impact 'informes' in turn
> the sense that individuals keep making of the situation instant
> after instant.
>
>
>
> My conclusions are more about the way in which emotions can be
> studied, and I pose questions to neuroscience, as I see Stern
> does! I suggest to do 'ethnographic nueroscience'. Stern (2004) says:
>
>
>
> " Two kinds of data are needed. First, accurate timing of brain
> activity correlated with phenomenal experiences. Second, the
> timing of th analogic shifts in intensity or magnitude of neural
> firing during the same phenomenal expereinces".
>
>
>
> I have to read more about Stern, I would like to understand what
> are the similarities and differences with Vygotsky's thought,
> and the usefulness of Stern's contribution. So far, so good :)
>
>
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Mabel
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 12:45:44 -0800
> > From: lpurss@shaw.ca
> > To: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> > Subject: [xmca] Emotions and culture
> >
> > Hi everyone
> > I wanted to look at another level of the discourse on
> emotions. This is to add to the recognition of the other levels
> such as institutionally and historically contexts of emotion.
> This in no way minimizes the critical importance of these levels
> of process for understanding emotion.
> > But, in the same spirit of discourse analysis which loos at
> the micro level of conversation I believe we expand our horizon
> of understanding by exploring the microgenesis of emotions as
> the interface between biology and culture. I have posted before
> on the position of Daniel Stern and the moment by moment
> generation of emotion. Today I want to summarize the thoughts of
> a DONNEL B. Stern to this discussion in his book "Unformulated
> Experience"
> >
> > (p.43)When we talk about content or structure or experience it
> is not a THING at all, but a PROCESS, one that has CONTINUITY
> OVER TIME. Some processes have more continuity (organization)
> some less. We act AS IF these discrete abstractions which our
> folk psychologhy labels thoughts, memories, feelings, are REAL
> but they are socially mediated constructions that locates
> experience in PARTICULAR stable ways. Psychoanalysis is
> interested in how these processes keep reproducing experience in
> similar shapes or patterns through interpretive organizing ACTIVITY.
> > Stern discusses a psychoanalyst "ROY SCHAFER" who attempts to
> translate all psychological events and language games into
> ACTION LANGUAGE to recognize these psychological events as
> ACTIVITY. Schafer chooses not to take this approach because
> communication becomes awkward.
> >
> > However he does elaborate the processes of REFLECTIVE
> EXPERIENCE (where we stand back from and observe our
> phenomicological processes. Folk psychology (common sense)
> leaves the impression that thoughts and emotions just arrive or
> leap into existence without the DEVELOPMENT of the thought or
> emotion. In reality each moment of experience is a process of
> emergence (MICROGENESIS) a sequence of necessary steps that must
> occur as experience UNFOLDS. Microgenesis, applied to thought
> and emotion develops from moment to moment in a process Donnel
> Stern calls FORMULATIND THE UNFORMULATED. The microgenetic lens
> emphasizes the developmental life (Dewey's "arc") of each
> present moment OUT OF the experience of the recently formulated
> experience. Conscious, explicit, liquistically articulated
> experience (formulated)emerges from activity (verbal and
> nonverbal) that took place in the preceding (sociocultural)
> moments. This emergence of experience INCLUDING THAT PART THAT
> ARRIVES IN AWARENESS is ORGANIC and CULTURAL and is a continuous
> dynamic process. Sometimes AFTER THE FACT the way one moment
> developed from the PREVIOUS one COMES TO OUR ATTENTION but more
> often it does not.
> > Donnel Stern uses the terms thought and emotion as heuristic
> devices and stress that he sees these processes as a single
> process of COGNITION (which for him is emotional-thought or
> thoughtful-emotion) Cognition is formulated as a process of
> emergence within sociocultural activity.
> > William Blake's metaphor "seeing the world in a grain of sand"
> captures the spirit of this inquiry at the microgenetic level.
> If this is seen as the unit of analysis it posits identity,
> subjectivity, and self-ing as emergent in moment to moment
> enactments which become organized into cultural patterns.
> >
> > I hope this captures the spirit of the relational frame
> emerging in psychoanalytic discourse. They also are elaborating
> how the micro, meso, and macro levels of process develop in
> particulat historical contexts.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > xmca mailing list
> > xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> > http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Windows Live: Keep your friends up to date with what you do online.
> http://www.microsoft.com/middleeast/windows/windowslive/see-it-
> in-action/social-network-
> basics.aspx?ocid=PID23461::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-xm:SI_SB_1:092010_______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca