These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
But I thought the more interesting thing about the provocation is that even though it seemed like exactly what I would expect from Mead, I could not be certain, because there are a number of others we are interested in who could just as well have said the same. That's what I find most interesting in this.
And I do think this is part of Hegel's legacy, such that even Lacan could have said much the same as this, although with somewhat differing implications.
On Sat, 31 Oct 2009, mike cole wrote:
Got it first try. Mead got his PhD with Dilthey. My own guess is that this goes back to at least Hegel, but others would know better. (Dishes done, snuck away) mike On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Ben DeVane <ben.devane@gmail.com> wrote:We just got done reading Mead in our pragmatism reading group here, and it sounds very Meadish (Vygotsky crossed with Dewey), so that's my guess. Honest I didn't look it up on Google. I really enjoyed the Holland & Lachicotte, and Edwards chapters on the parallels between Mead and Vygotsky in the Cambridge handbook. Highly recommended for anyone unfamiliar with Mead's work. -Ben On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 8:09 PM, mike cole <lchcmike@gmail.com> wrote:In preparing for class just now i fell across this sentence. Obvious who wrote it without looking it up on google? ?*The self is something which has a development*, it is not initiallythereat birth, but arises in the process of social experiences and activity,thatis, develops in the given individual as a result of his relations to that process as a whole and to other individuals within that process? My own relations are saying get the hell off the computer, the doorbellisringing and the goblins are on the move. So off i go. mike _______________________________________________ xmca mailing list xmca@weber.ucsd.edu http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca-- *********************** Ben DeVane Ph.D Candidate Games+Learning+Society Research Group University of Wisconsin-Madison ***********************_______________________________________________ xmca mailing list xmca@weber.ucsd.edu http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
Tony Whitson
UD School of Education
NEWARK DE 19716
twhitson@udel.edu
_______________________________
"those who fail to reread
are obliged to read the same story everywhere"
-- Roland Barthes, S/Z (1970)_______________________________________________ xmca mailing list xmca@weber.ucsd.edu http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca