Yes, I think that is how Bruner treats it. On Sat, 3 Oct 2009, mike cole wrote:
But enactive is not seen as instrumental to symbolic, Tony, but a prior "stage" isn't it?? mike On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 7:11 AM, Tony Whitson <twhitson@udel.edu> wrote:On Sat, 3 Oct 2009, mike cole wrote: And ditto re movement and learning. An idea that Wade Boykinchampioned many years ago, but he was not listened to. mikeAs I read this, I happen to be working with Bruner's developmental series of enactive, iconic, and symbolic representation. Bruner, J. S. (1964). The course of cognitive growth. American Psychologist, 19(1), 1-15. It's amazing how when I'm as intensely involved now in what I'm writing, everywhere I turn I see things that mesh this closely.
Tony Whitson
UD School of Education
NEWARK DE 19716
twhitson@udel.edu
_______________________________
"those who fail to reread
are obliged to read the same story everywhere"
-- Roland Barthes, S/Z (1970)
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca