These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.

These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [xmca] Hedegaard article



Hold on, Jay. This is part of your argument AGAINST simplistic, offensive
categorical distinctions? Can you clarify?

Martin


On 3/5/09 9:50 AM, "Jay Lemke" <jaylemke@umich.edu> wrote:

> strong or  
> dominant cultures, are the ones that, like French or British or German
> are highly, maybe even pathologically monological and conformitarian.
> Be like the single ideal and only that or you are out, out of the
> power game. Nasty, really. 


_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca