These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes, and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving. Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards. If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site, please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.

These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes, and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving. Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards. If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site, please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.

Re: [xmca] XM, C's and H's

From: Andy Blunden <ablunden who-is-at mira.net>
Date: Mon Dec 15 2008 - 21:15:29 PST

At last! I've been driving myself crazy over this one. The
discussion of "Folk Psychology" I liked was in:

*Jerome Bruner. Acts of Meaning: Four Lectures on Mind and
Culture*

It's on Google books, so you can check it out there. Sorry
for all that! :(

Andy

Andy Blunden wrote:
> Derek, I should sleep some more, and then maybe I'd remember not only
> how to spell an author's name, but also which author I was reading! My
> apologies. I will continue trying to discover in which book I found this
> interesing argument.
>
> But in the meantime, I was not absolutely completely deceiving you in
> that Tomasello has an extended argument about what he calls "Gricean
> Communicative intention," the drift of which is that you can only make
> sense of people's speech and actions on the basis that the speaker
> assumes that the listener knows what the speaker's intention is, and
> that the speaker knows that the listener knows that the speaker knows
> that the listener knows the speaker's intention, and so on ad infinitum.
> In my words a rational knowledge of "folk psychology" is presupposed in
> communicative action.
>
> Andy
>
> Derek Melser wrote:
>> Andy,
>> I was looking up Tomasello's 'Origins of Human Communication' on
>> google books -- as you were writing this last email of yours, as it
>> happens -- hoping to browse the bit on folk psychology, but it assures
>> me there is no reference to 'folk psychology' in the entire book. How
>> can this be???
>> DM
>>
>> 2008/12/16 Andy Blunden <ablunden@mira.net <mailto:ablunden@mira.net>>
>>
>> Oops, I meant Michael Tomasello. (I realised this while asleep last
>> night! Isn't that weird?)
>> Andy
>> Andy Blunden wrote:
>>
>>
>> Michael Thomasino has a nice bit about "folk psychology" in his
>> "Origins of Human Communication" where he points out that folk
>> psychology exists as a real force in human life and goes from
>> there into a very interesting argument. You should have a look
>> at it.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> xmca mailing list
>> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu <mailto:xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
>> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>>
>>
>

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Andy Blunden http://home.mira.net/~andy/ +61 3 9380 9435 
Skype andy.blunden
Hegel's Logic with a Foreword by Andy Blunden:
http://www.marxists.org/admin/books/index.htm
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
Received on Mon Dec 15 21:16:17 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jan 06 2009 - 13:39:39 PST