These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes, and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving. Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards. If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site, please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes, and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving. Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards. If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site, please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
David,
I do too, and for very similar reasons.
On 2/20/08 3:51 PM, "David Kellogg" <vaughndogblack@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I do prefer "personal" to "individual", and I prefer "personality" to
> "individuality". Here's why.
>
What about Vygotsky's use of experimentation? Do you see that in Marx's
method too?
> That's why I think Bakhurst's right; the whole method comes from Marx. But
> we can only really clearly see this when we discard "activity" as the
> fundamental unit of analysis and go back to LSV and word meanings. Word
> meanings always involve the interface between persons; they are what make up
> personality.
>
Martin
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it
> now.
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
Received on Wed Feb 20 19:07 PST 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 06 2008 - 10:37:02 PST