Re: [xmca] chit chat

From: Andy Blunden <ablunden who-is-at>
Date: Wed Dec 26 2007 - 14:56:23 PST

Well, for example, I propose an approach to the vexed sign/tool issue which
introduces a new ontological solution as well as adding a third instance to
this dualism. I would have thought this alone could have kept us going for
a month.
Also, my article does claim to offer an approach to the "problem of the
individual" and I certainly know of no better solution; that would be worth
a bit of discussion.
At 10:37 AM 26/12/2007 -0800, you wrote:
>I am unsure where we are on the subject of the subject in Andy's article.
>I only have bits and patch's of the discussion articulated and a
>vague memory to look up idiographic/nomothetic on wikipedia.
>What do you make, overall, of the discussion thus far, Andy, and what issues
>have not been raised that would be helful to you?

xmca mailing list
Received on Wed Dec 26 14:57 PST 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jan 07 2008 - 10:13:50 PST