These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.

These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.

Re: [xmca] Nobel prize talks stupid things about human intelligence

From: Andy Blunden <ablunden who-is-at mira.net>
Date: Sun Oct 21 2007 - 01:42:56 PDT

Eric, I was not following this debate closely. This post clearly explains
where you are coming from, so my "What's the problem?" response was
uncalled for. I guess I was not reacting to Watson as a "grand old man" and
"non-conformist" who "made a mistake" but rather as one of many people who
follow unthinkingly in the trend of which Watson was a contributor, to the
effect that it is "all in the genes." So of course in his "correction" he
only repeats what caused offence: "Africans aren't inferior, just different
... because of their genes."
I should apologise for using derogatory words about anyone on this list, I
suppose, but any specialist who thinks that their own particular specialism
explains everything is not in my humble opinion worthy of very much praise.
Andy
At 07:45 PM 20/10/2007 +0200, you wrote:
>Well, the issue here is (at least from my point of view) in part how the mass
>media works ("sanctimonious mob reaction" being the outcome of a growing
>moral
>panic). The issue is also whether academe should close ranks and support this
>sanctimonious current, or whether it should bide its time and aspire to
>mobilize some kind of rational, temperate counterweight to the usual "mob"
>chain reaction.
>
>According to this article:
>http://news.independent.co.uk/sci_tech/article3075664.ece
>
>... he has said that: "To those who have drawn the inference from my words
>that
>Africa, as a continent, is somehow genetically inferior, I can only apologise
>unreservedly. This is not what I meant. More importantly from my point of
>view,
>there is no scientific basis for such a belief."
>
>"This is not a discussion about superiority or inferiority, it is about
>seeking
>to understand differences, about why some of us are great musicians and
>others
>great engineers."
>
>"[S]cience is not here to make us feel good."
>
>Perhaps he was misquoted, who knows? He is 79 years old, a grand old man.
>Should every non-conformist specimen of the species be ostracized for being
>wrong or misquoted? How would the history of science look like without
>scientists making mistakes? Who wants to cast the first dogmatist stone?
>
>E.
>
>
>On 2007-10-20, at 18:21, Mike Cole wrote:
> > Yes, there is a kind of sanctimonious mob reaction to Watson's remarks.
> > We have been here before with THIS issue and one does not have to go back
> > to Latin. We might start with Larry Summers re gender.
> >
> > The crux of the matter seems to me to be the following in Watson's case:
> > "all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is
> > the same as ours - whereas all the testing says not really".
> >
> > The "them" appears to apply to people of African decent, which includes
> > everyone
> > on XMCA if one wants to take that implication seriously, but really, to
> > people who
> > remained in Africa (a hugelyl heterogeneous continent) when our more
> > immediate
> > predecessors migrated elsewhere, including the Australian outback, the
> north
> > of Norway, and
> > island of Hokaido (for whom similar claims have been made).
> >
> > In my view, the man is badly misinformed. "The testing" he refers to is
> > not like the kind of test for
> > genetic markers, HIV, etc that he is used to dealing with, and scholars
> > like Sternberg and Grigorenko,
> > following on a long line of work (the early history of which is traced
> by SJ
> > Gould, Gustav Jahoda, in my monograph
> > of 1996, the Handbook of Cross Cultural Psychology, where the work of
> Dasen,
> > Serpell, and others
> > is described says NO SUCH THING.
> >
> > However, if he wants to site literature to support his point of view,
> he can
> > find it. Arthur Jensen has retired
> > but he has not disappeared. Nor have some other behavioral geneticists who
> > make the same argument.
> > I would not be surprised to see them surface in his defense as time passes.
> > We will see.
> >
> > Remind me not to make ill informed pronouncements about DNA that offend
> > people's deep beliefs.
> >
> > mike
> > On 10/20/07, Wolff-Michael Roth <mroth@uvic.ca> wrote:
> >>
> >> I don't want to be overly picky, but it is "rero" (Lat. for accused)
> >> not "reo," as I seem to be recalling from my Latin lessons some 40
> >> years ago. :-)
> >> Cheers,
> >> Michael
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 19-Oct-07, at 11:43 PM, E. Knutsson wrote:
> >>
> >> In dubio pro reo? No doubt! Immediate crucifixion! And where is
> >> Barabbas? Or
> >> Giordano Bruno?
> >>
> >> On 2007-10-19, at 15:55, David Preiss wrote:
> >> >
> >> > http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7052416.stm
> >> >
> >> > In his Sunday Times interview, Dr James Watson was quoted as saying
> >> > he was "inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa" because "all
> >> > our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is
> >> > the same as ours - whereas all the testing says not really".
> >> >
> >> > He was further quoted as saying that his hope was that everyone was
> >> > equal but that "people who have to deal with black employees find
> >> > this is not true".
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Just disgusting, racist, horrible...
> >> >
> >> > David
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > David Preiss, Ph.D.
> >> > Subdirector de Extensión y Comunicaciones
> >> > Escuela de Psicología
> >> > Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
> >> > Av Vicuña Mackenna 4860
> >> > Macul, Santiago
> >> > Chile
> >> >
> >> > Fono: 3544605
> >> > Fax: 3544844
> >> > e-mail: davidpreiss@uc.cl
> >> > web personal: http://web.mac.com/ddpreiss/
> >> > web institucional: http://www.epuc.cl/profesores/dpreiss
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > xmca mailing list
> >> > xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> >> > http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> xmca mailing list
> >> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> >> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> xmca mailing list
> >> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> >> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > xmca mailing list
> > xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> > http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
>_______________________________________________
>xmca mailing list
>xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
>http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca

  Andy Blunden : http://home.mira.net/~andy/ tel (H) +61 3 9380 9435,
mobile 0409 358 651

_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
Received on Sun Oct 21 01:47 PDT 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Nov 20 2007 - 14:25:43 PST