These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes, and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving. Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards. If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site, please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes, and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving. Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards. If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site, please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
I guess the fact that this fool holds a Nobel Prize for work in genetics
makes his remarks particularly dangerous. A year ago I flipped over a paper
published by the Australian Journal of Psychology which agreed with Watson.
Both idiots think that a statistical difference in educational outcomes can
only explained by genetics. Maybe a better explanation would be the lousy
education our anglo-saxon scientists get from our universities? Given the
current fad for everything genetic this is all unsurprising, but dangerous
nonetheless.
Andy
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 22:35:06 +1000
To: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
From: Andy Blunden <ablunden@mira.net>
Subject: Re: [xmca] reading ability is genetic!? (read this one!)
Here's a paper by this group:
http://genepi.qimr.edu.au/staff/nick_pdf/CV382.pdf
They prove that differential reading ability in people is genetic using ...
statistics.
Andy
-------------------------------------------------------
At 10:37 PM 20/10/2007 -0300, you wrote:
>It was not Watson´s first time:
>
>http://observer.guardian.co.uk/focus/story/0,,2195980,00.html
>
>For those who want to skip the link, the essential paragraphs written
>by Robin McKie in London and Paul Harris in New York say:
>"Watson is renowned for his controversial views. He sees himself as a
>free-thinker, though it must be admitted his ideas often simply seem
>eccentric. In 1997, he suggested it would be acceptable to terminate
>a foetus if it carried a gene that might mean the adult that grows
>from it was gay. He has also suggested a link between sunlight and
>libido. 'That is why you have Latin lovers. You've never heard of an
>English lover,' he said. And Watson has also proposed that a foetus
>destined to be 'stupid' should be aborted.
>
>Such maverick remarks led the journal Science to conclude, in 1990,
>that 'to many in the scientific community, Watson has long been
>something of a wild man, and his colleagues tend to hold their
>collective breath whenever he veers from the script'. This track
>record explains one intriguing feature of the Watson affair. Although
>the Sunday Times carried the interview in which the scientist
>outlined his disparaging views about black people, the paper kept his
>remarks buried in its colour magazine.
>
>A story was offered to the Sunday Times newsdesk by magazine staff,
>but was declined on the grounds that Watson had said such things in
>the past, as indeed he had. Thus it was left to Simon Kelner, editor
>of the Independent, to take Watson's claims and to run them as its
>lead story on Wednesday, under the banner: 'Africans are less
>intelligent that Westerners, says DNA pioneer'. In this way, Watson's
>fate was sealed."
>
>More contextual info in the above link and in this one (which
>includes more similar insensitive statements):
>
>http://news.independent.co.uk/people/profiles/article3078966.ece
>
>There is a track of remarks he has made that show, beyond reasonable
>doubt, he has a political agenda disguised as science.
>
>I am sure we will hear in the next few days of some (not necessarily
>representative of their fields) evolutionary psychologists and
>behavioral geneticists... trying to sell us the idea that opposing
>these remarks is an attack on free speech (in a similar manner the
>neoconservatives think that criticism of the government is
>unpatriotic). Alas, poor Yorick! I knew him, Horatio...
>
>David Preiss, Ph.D.
>Subdirector de Extensión y Comunicaciones
>Escuela de Psicología
>Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
>Av Vicuña Mackenna 4860
>Macul, Santiago
>Chile
>
>Fono: 3544605
>Fax: 3544844
>e-mail: davidpreiss@uc.cl
>web personal: http://web.mac.com/ddpreiss/
>web institucional: http://www.epuc.cl/profesores/dpreiss
>
>_______________________________________________
>xmca mailing list
>xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
>http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
Andy Blunden : http://home.mira.net/~andy/ tel (H) +61 3 9380 9435,
mobile 0409 358 651
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
Received on Sat Oct 20 20:38 PDT 2007