These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.

These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.

RE: [xmca] Wells article

From: Gordon Wells <gwells who-is-at ucsc.edu>
Date: Sun Oct 07 2007 - 19:53:07 PDT

> Sasha wrote:
>
>2. As for problem with terms die Vorstellung and das Begriff or their
>Russian equivalent predstavlenie i pon'atie, it has nothing to do with any
>linguistic. Actually the problem has utterly practical significance. Each
>school-teacher or college professor which meets with special ability of
>his/here students to repeat after him/here using correct words and theoretic
>definitions without a tiny hint to real understanding of problems analyzing
>in his/her lecture meets with mentioned above substantial distinction
>between Vorstellung and Begriff. So this distinction plays a great role not
>only in Hegel's or Il'enkov's logical treatise, but in schools, colleges and
>I will add in research practice. Even Vygotsky who knew both German and
>Russian and moreover was acquainted with Hegel's and Marx' philosophy become
>confused in those categories. Thus reasoning about a development of concepts
>(der Begriff) he puts so called "scientific concept" (which in actual fact
>is nothing but formal verbal definition or die Vorstellung) in the summit of
>the hierarchy of concepts. The great difficultness for all who really want
>to understand something, not only imitate such an understanding before
>those boring teachers, is to fight his/here way through the word's shell to
>the real understanding. The crucial criteria of such an understanding is
>practice. I do comprehend something (I muster das Begriff) if basing on my
>understanding I can practically act (by my own hands or by hands of other
>people) upon some natural or cultural object according to its objective
>shape. And contrary the brilliant "knowledge" of all kind of verbal
>definitions has nothing to do with real education and real research.

BRAVO!

-- 
Gordon Wells
Department of Education
University of California, Santa Cruz		http://people.ucsc.edu/~gwells
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
Received on Sun Oct 7 19:58 PDT 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Nov 20 2007 - 14:25:43 PST