These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
Hi Vera, here it is:
http://www.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/mathpanel/index.html
Cheers,
Michael
On 31-Mar-08, at 9:53 AM, Vera Steiner wrote:
Hi Michael,
Do you have a link to the Advisory Panel's report?
Vera
Wolff-Michael Roth wrote:
> Hi Karen, I am in the process of thinking|meaning|writing, the
> (temporary) end product will be my position. Cheers, Michael
>
>
> On 31-Mar-08, at 9:20 AM, Karen Wieckert wrote:
>
> Can you give some ideas what you think of this report here?
>
> Also, I believe it dovetails with issues around NCLB (pointed to
> recently by
> Eric R.), as the criteria of research has been taken directly from
> that
> program.
>
> Ka:ren
>
> P.S. I am sorry about the NO SUBJECT. I wish my email program
> would help
> me with that!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu [mailto:xmca-
> bounces@weber.ucsd.edu] On
> Behalf Of Wolff-Michael Roth
> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 8:44 AM
> To: eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity
> Cc: Brian Greer; B Sriraman
> Subject: Re: [xmca] (no subject)
>
> Hi there, I am in the process of contributing to a response by a
> number of mathematics educators to be published in "The Montana
> Mathematics Enthusiast" taking up, among others, those issues Karen
> has been abstracting from the Panel report.
> Cheers,
> Michael
>
>
> On 31-Mar-08, at 8:32 AM, Karen Wieckert wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> I thought some of you might be interested in how the National
> Mathematics
> Advisory Panel final report describes research on learning based on
> LSV.
>
> "The sociocultural perspective of Vygotsky has also been
> influential in
> education. It characterizes learning as a social induction process
> through
> which learners become increasingly independent through the tutelage
> of more
> knowledgeable peers and adults. However, its utility in mathematics
> classrooms and mathematics curricula remains to be scientifically
> tested. "
> (p. 30, General Principles of Learning)
>
> The inclusion criteria for studies included by the panelists threw out
> specific types of research...
>
> "Systematic reviews of research on mathematics education by the task
> groups
> and subcommittees of the Panel yielded thousands of studies on
> important
> topics, but only a small proportion met standards for rigor for the
> causal
> questions the Panel was attempting to answer. The dearth of relevant
> rigorous research in the field is a concern. First, the number of
> experimental studies in education that can provide answers to
> questions of
> cause and effect is currently small. Although the number of such
> studies has
> grown in recent years due to changes in policies and priorities at
> federal
> agencies, these studies are only beginning to yield findings that can
> inform
> educational policy and practice. Second, in educational research over
> the
> past two decades, the pendulum has swung sharply away from
> quantitative
> analyses that permit inferences from samples to populations. Third,
> there is
> a need for a stronger emphasis on such aspects of scientific rigor as
> operational definitions of constructs, basic research to clarify
> phenomena
> and constructs, and disconfirmation of hypotheses. Therefore, debates
> about
> issues of national importance, which mainly concern cause and effect,
> have
> devolved into matters of personal opinion rather than scientific
> evidence."
> (p. 63, Research Policies and Mechanisms)
>
> In the Appendix, on pg. 81, the Standards of Evidence are laid out as
> they
> were developed by a subcommittee. Specifically,
>
> "In general, these principles call for strongest confidence to be
> placed in
> studies that
> . Test hypotheses
> . Meet the highest methodological standards (internal validity)
> . Have been replicated with diverse samples of students under
> conditions that warrant generalization (external validity)"
>
> The full report can be found here...
>
> http://www.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/mathpanel/index.html
>
> Ka:ren Wieckert
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
Received on Mon Mar 31 10:30 PDT 2008