Dear Michalis,
I think there isn't any direct evidence for a Peircean influence. But I also think it's there.
One POSSIBLE conduit is Volosinov. van Lier (2004) has pointed out that Volosinov's analysis of "Well!" in "Discourse in Art and Discourse in Life" (the appendix to his book on Freudianism) is reducible with almost no remainder to a Peircean one.
Andy would say this is because of their common Hegelian origin. Peirce and Volosinov are cousins in the same generation like apes and humans; the latter is not descended from the former. That's probably so. But still, as Marx would say, "the anatomy of man is the key to the anatomy of the ape".
David Kellogg
Seoul National University of Education
---------------------------------
Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
Received on Thu Mar 20 16:28 PDT 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Apr 01 2008 - 00:30:03 PDT