Re: [xmca] Gardeners and Tram Drivers

mike,
   
  I read the article and while it seemed so New Yorker and cutesy (Spiro Agnew echoing about effete whatevers) I was really dismayed by the entire string of claims that included (I paraphrase) '' most of us find globalism the best of all possible worlds" . Is that really the case? Do most of us (who's that?) believe that global corporate domination <=> globalism is the best of all possible worlds. How about "small is beautiful", a much more gardenlike metaphor. Perhaps humanity at the horticultural stage, pre-large scale crop stuff, was nobler. Probably more enjoyable no matter what the globalists say about life in the city is pretty.
   
  Paul Dillon
   
   
  
Mike Cole <lchcmike@gmail.com> wrote:
  The section marked in yellow (did it come through, David?) was a commentary
by Eugene Subbotsky. I personally found the piece interesting, but that
is simply my taste. I have long had a copy of Dream of the Red Chamber.
Guess its time to look at it!

mike

On 4/2/07, David Kellogg wrote:
>
> I was being conciliatory by changing the subject, Mike. Frankly, I think
> the Gopnik piece is a study in projection and consequently anachronism. I
> don't think that Voltaire's love of gardening makes him a conservative
> bourgeois in his social outlook. In those days, being bourgeois was not
> particularly conservative, and had little to do with gardening.
>
> I think that gardening had more to do with being an artist. Monet had a
> fabulous garden at Giverny along the same lines as Ferney (a groaning board
> well surrounded by garrulous convives) and so did that other
> pessimist-meliorist Thomas Hardy. Even Van Gogh gardened in his miserable
> last days in hospital.
>
> "Candide" is not simply an attack on Leibniz; "il faut cultiver notre
> jardin" was probably a jab at Rousseau. Rousseau had written to Voltaire
> that the great Lisbon earthquake was a human disaster, not a natural one,
> and "Candide" was Voltaire's rather unkind riposte. You may remember that
> the actual originator of the line is not Candide-Rousseau himself but an
> ignorant Turkish peasant. So I think "We must work our fields" is a fair
> translation, contrary to what Gopnik says.
>
> Rousseau believed that falsehood, not ignorance, was the real source of
> human error. Voltaire believed that mankind was irredeemably stupid, though
> some parts of it (e.g. the English) were noticeably more intelligent than
> others. In this respect, Rousseau represents the young, genuinely
> rationalist (and genuinely bourgeois) enlightenment intellectual.
>
> Voltaire in his dotage was a defeated and rather cynical skeptic (as
> well as a blithering anti-semite), casting doubt on the ability of knowledge
> to ameliorate and prevent disasters without being able to cast much light on
> the future. It's fairly easy to see why Voltaire would capture people's
> imagination in our own epoch and why Rousseau would attract mostly ridicule.
>
> Interestingly, while Voltaire was writing Candide, on the other side of
> the world the Chinese recluse Cao Xueqin was writing the world's first
> social realist novel "Hongloumeng" (translated, rather badly, as "Dream of
> the Red Chamber"). The central chronotope of the novel is a garden, first
> built by the noble Jia family in honor of their daughter, who after having
> been made an imperial concubine some years before, is allowed a single day
> of home leave.
>
> The building of the garden bankrupts the family, but it gives the
> children a kind of wonderland free of adults to discover sex and live out
> their childhoods consuming crabmeat and writing poetry about it ("Blame not
> the crab for walking askance; it is the ways of the world that are
> crooked"). Early in the novel the hero Jia Baoyu rmarks on how curious it is
> that a wealthy family like his own should invest its entire fortune
> destroying nature, then building a wall around the rubble, then trying
> desperately to reconstruct within that wall a simulacrum of what they had
> destroyed. Mightn't they have simply left things as they were? Rousseau
> would have understood his bewilderment. Voltaire would have been bewildered
> by it.
>
> David Kellogg
> Seoul National University of Education
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Finding fabulous fares is fun.
> Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and
> hotel bargains.
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca

 
---------------------------------
TV dinner still cooling?
Check out "Tonight's Picks" on Yahoo! TV.
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
Received on Tue Apr 3 22:22 PDT 2007