Dear Michael,
I'm interested in this paper too! I have been thinking of dialectics in
knowledge building communities, and would love to read this paper.
Thanks,
Jianwei
=================================
Jianwei Zhang, PhD, Post-doctoral Fellow
Institute for Knowledge Innovation and Technology
OISE/University of Toronto
9th Floor, 252 Bloor Street West
Toronto, ON, Canada, M5S 1V6
Phone: 1-416-923-6641 ext. 2594
Fax: 1-416-926-4713
http://ikit.org/~zhangjw/
=================================
On 15-May-06, at 1:03 PM, Wolff-Michael Roth wrote:
> Hi all,
> if anyone is interested in the question of CoP and CHAT, my colleague
> and former grad student Yew Jin LEE and I have an article coming out
> in a new review journal published by the European Association for
> Research on Learning and Instruction. Those interested let me know and
> I can make available (for personal use following copyright) the galley
> version of this article re-theorizing CoP and C of Learners from a
> dialectical perspective.
> Cheers,
> Michael
>
>
>
> On 15-May-06, at 8:54 AM, Tony Whitson wrote:
>
> Interesting idea, Don.
>
> While we're at this, I'm wondering about Legitimate Peripheral
> Participation (LPP) in Communities of Practice (CoP) as a related
> framework (i.e., Lave, Wenger, et al.).
>
> CoP theory seems more immediately obvious as a framework for design
> for doctoral preparation; but CoP & CHAT seem compatable, overlapping,
> etc. but not identical. Don, your suggestion could provide a concrete
> focus for exploring the relationships between these frameworks.
>
> On Mon, 15 May 2006, Cunningham, Donald James wrote:
>
>> I have been interested in the Carnegie Initiative on the Doctorate
>> (there is a recent article about it in the Educational Researcher -
>> http://www.aera.net/uploadedFiles/Publications/Journals/
>> Educational_Rese
>> archer/3503/3592-03_Shulman_RN_C.pdf). It occurred to me that in our
>> quest to identify good existing examples of zopeds, an alternative
>> strategy might be to design one. Often it is easier to understand
>> something you have created than something you are looking at from the
>> outside. What would a doctoral program built along the principles of
>> CHAT look like? For example, would there be "leading activities"
>> and/or
>> "social situations of development" and/or
>> "meaning-formation-activities". If so, what are some examples? Would
>> using Engestrom's triangles assist us in designing or revising a
>> doctoral program? In what way would the essence of a zoped be
>> embodied?
>> Maybe some of you already know of such programs and could tell us
>> about
>> them.
>>
>>
>>
>> Anyone interested in exploring this?
>>
>>
>>
>> Don Cunningham
>>
>> Indiana University
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> xmca mailing list
>> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
>> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>>
>
> Tony Whitson
> UD School of Education
> NEWARK DE 19716
>
> twhitson@udel.edu
> _______________________________
>
> "those who fail to reread
> are obliged to read the same story everywhere"
> -- Roland Barthes, S/Z (1970)
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 02 2006 - 08:02:43 PDT