The problem is, IMHO, that once we define the relevant structure as
inter-individual and intra-individual, we have moved away from the
insights which have given the CHAT tradition its great strength. This
posing of the problem makes the individual the basic unit of analysis
and discounts the existence of mediation (i.e. the "CH" part of CHAT)
at a fundamental level. Personally, I think this is the wrong way to
go to find a solution to the objectivist tendencies in CHAT.
Andy
At 08:11 PM 31/10/2005 +0000, bb wrote:
Further, subjectivity is a continuum of inter-individual to
intra-individual processes (thus allowing for in-the-head processes
such as memory and attention, as well across-the-heads processes
such as communication?), supporting the claim that "This approach
therefore helps to ascertain the agentive role of individual
processes and of human subjectivity within a profoundly social,
transactional, and object-related ontology of human life."
Andy Blunden, on behalf of the Victorian Peace Network, Phone (+61)
03-9380 9435
Alexander Surmava's Tour - September/October 2006
[1]http://ethicalpolitics.org[2]/alexander-surmava/index.htm
References
1. http://ethicalpolitics.org/alexander-surmava/index.htm
2. http://ethicalpolitics.org/alexander-surmava/index.htm
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 01 2005 - 01:00:22 PST