Yes, I agree. We have a lot left to discuss about Anna's paper. Steve has
provided a detailed re-presentation (is it adequate as an abbreviated
summary
from your perspective, Anna?). Then we might try a paper in Spanish. I will
leave it to those fluent in the language to come up with a suggestion and
help
us out.
We also await the next XMCA article and the reading on being posthuman
suggested
by Mary. And I am almost certainly forgetting other matters.
mike
On 10/31/05, Phil Chappell <philchappell@mac.com> wrote:
>
> Hola David,
>
> ¿Quizás deberíamos esperar la discusión corriente de papel de
> Stetsenko a concluir, y luego podemos hablar de un texto en
> Castillian o español qué usted y los otros eligen?
>
> Phil
>
> On 31/10/2005, at 9:10 PM, David Daniel Preiss Contreras wrote:
>
> > Hola,
> >
> > Ésta me parece una excelente idea. ¿Por qué no empezamos por un
> > texto en español o castellano? Debiésemos, entonces, seleccionar un
> > texto y comenzar una discusión. ¿Qué les parece?
> > David
> >
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 01 2005 - 01:00:22 PST