Mike, I have a paper (entry for an encyclopedia) that might be of help
with respect to semiotics:
http://mypage.iu.edu/~cunningh/Meaning%20Sense%20and%20Reference%20submi
tted.pdf
This is a first version, not to be cited or reproduced. The publisher in
question threatens dire consequences! But for what it is worth, have a
look and I would appreciate feedback........djc
Don Cunningham
Indiana University
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Cole [mailto:lchcmike@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2005 12:01 AM
To: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
Subject: Re: "activity theory" vs. semiotics
Rather than a word count, could anyone help with clarification of the
use of the terms
sign, symbol, and meaning as they relate to activity theory and
semiotics? Progress along this line seems meagre, or at least, my
ability to summarize it is meagre!
mike
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 04:44:35 +0000, xmcageek@comcast.net
<xmcageek@comcast.net> wrote:
> Not that any of this is serious of course, but with the rules of this
google site when you put in "activity theory", in quotes, you are not
simply combining terms but actually looking for the string "activity
theory" *including* the quotes. Googlefight already combines terms
(look at the URL details of googlefight to see the differences. Quotes
will be encoded as %22)
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 01 2005 - 01:00:04 PST