[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: math for reproduction and domination

This is indeed a quite interesting counterpoint. But I don't see the
opposites. I see analysis of classroom practices as cultural historical
analysis itself and the observation of classroom minutiae as the discovery
of the microgenetic mechanisms through which culture constantly reproduces
and changes. I also disagree with the vision that classroom practices are
essentially reproductive. From Philip's example one can actually deduce how
they are actually quite permeable to cultural change.
David Preiss, M.Phil.
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile www.puc.cl <http://www.puc.cl/> 
PACE Center at Yale University www.yale.edu/pace
Homepage: http://pantheon.yale.edu/~ddp6/
Phone: 56-2-3547174
E-mail: david.preiss@yale.edu or davidpreiss@yale.edu

-----Mensaje original-----
De: White, Phillip [mailto:Phillip.White@cudenver.edu] 
Enviado el: Thursday, November 11, 2004 5:10 PM
Para: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
Asunto: RE: math for reproduction and domination

good afternoon  -  a clinical teacher and i earlier today observed a teacher
candidate teach a lesson of fraction equivalents with fifth graders, the
majority of whom were born in mexico  -  the teacher candidate immigrated to
the states a few years ago from korea.  watching how everyone struggled with
second language issues, the use of manipulatives, how to organize their
graphic organizers on a piece of paper, build mutual understanding, etc. was
to observe a highly complex social interaction.  at that point of time, for
thirty minutes, the focus was on highly discreet proceedural skills that
supported individual concept formation.  i have backgrounded in my head the
multiplicity of the cultural historical conditions that brought all of us
together in that room on that particular spot on the floor at that time.  to
move into a cultural historical analysis of this 30 minute event certainly
isn't feasible just now  -  people's attention is focused on a very narrow
kind of learning, which is needed to maintain everyday classroom practices
so that these larger questions can then be considered.
i'm still wondering where the classroom teacher that Bill is working with,
where her perspective is.  


From: Bill Barowy [mailto:xmcageek@comcast.net]
Sent: Thu 11/11/2004 11:39 AM
To: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
Subject: Re: math for reproduction and domination

What I meant was, I'm simply trying to cook some notes, and while that does
not preclude a cultural historical analysis at some  later time, the
at this moment centers on some kids learning some math.  The analysis will
surely and eventually broaden, as yrjo's expansive methodolgy demands.
questions concerning NCTM content has already been moving things toward
cultural historical analysis.

And then, I have the impression of some history of xmca conversations going
down the dialectical philosophical path and then, paradoxically, failing to
rise back up again to the concrete.  I'd like to stay concrete as long as


<<attachment: winmail.dat>>