Interesting "bounce" of my post. Perhaps this could be sent on to ucsd
sysadmins for analysis? Full headers should facilitate.
bb
---------- Forwarded Message ----------
Received: from area51.scsv.nevada.edu ([131.216.1.176])
by rwcrmxc12.comcast.net (rwcrmxc12) with ESMTP
id <20031229154941r1200btv0te>; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 15:49:41 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [131.216.1.176]
Received: from area51.scsv.nevada.edu (daemon who-is-at localhost [127.0.0.1])
by area51.scsv.nevada.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hBTFnfEE018128
for <wbarowy@attbi.com>; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 07:49:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from daemon who-is-at localhost)
by area51.scsv.nevada.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id hBTFneho018127;
Mon, 29 Dec 2003 07:49:40 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 07:49:40 -0800 (PST)
From: daemon@nevada.edu
Message-Id: <200312291549.hBTFneho018127@area51.scsv.nevada.edu>
Subject: The address xmca@weber.ucsd.edu is no longer valid.
To: Bill Barowy <wbarowy@attbi.com>
Status: R
X-Status: N
The address xmca@weber.ucsd.edu is no longer valid.
Please use xmca@unlv.nevada.edu instead.
Please note that your original message to xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
was not delivered and will need to be resent to xmca@unlv.nevada.edu .
Your original message follows:
=========================================================================
Received: from weber.ucsd.edu (weber.ucsd.edu [132.239.206.10])
by area51.scsv.nevada.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id hBTFndEE018117
for <haught@unlv.edu>; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 07:49:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by weber.ucsd.edu (Postfix, from userid 14)
id 1E44F8165; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 07:49:34 -0800 (PST)
Old-Return-Path: <owner-xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
X-Original-To: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
Delivered-To: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Bill Barowy <wbarowy@attbi.com>
To: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
Subject: Re: false consciousness: real and virtual worlds
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 10:49:19 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3
References:
<OF7028A13D.1A50CF9F-ON86256E0A.006DF8A1-86256E0A.006FDC39@lsu.edu>
<009001c3ce1f$41fe51c0$ad01a8c0 who-is-at workgroup> In-Reply-To:
<009001c3ce1f$41fe51c0$ad01a8c0 who-is-at workgroup>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <200312291049.19901@summit.net>
X-Spam-Level: Level
X-Spamscanner: mailbox3.ucsd.edu (v1.4 Dec 3 2003 15:07:19, 0.0/5.0 2.60)
X-MailScanner: PASSED (v1.2.8 25024 hBTFnUZT029289 mailbox3.ucsd.edu)
Resent-Message-ID: <fsLWYB.A.coB.O0E8_ who-is-at weber>
Resent-From: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
Reply-To: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
X-Mailing-List: <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu> archive/latest/18990
X-Loop: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu
Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 07:49:34 -0800 (PST)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by area51.scsv.nevada.edu
id hBTFndEE018117
Without using the "I..." word, David left me with this impression: he was
making the point that class perspectives do not capture well the rich
complexity of human experience. For me, this protest does not detract from
the usefullness of a class perspective for understanding the challenges that
are common to people within particular socio-economc categories, but rather
notes that there are limits to the usefulness of a class perspective as one
"zooms-in" to examine a finer-grain of activity.
-------------------------------------------------------
-- ----------------- bb
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 01:00:10 PST