Hi Gordon.
Yeah, we've been jumping through hoops for the past 2 years to redesign
our teacher certification programs in line with stringent new state
guidelines. But the shift from certification programs to regular academic
masters degree programs is something new here. Is the same sort of
regulation
you're grappling with for certification programs also being imposed on
your non-certification grad programs in California?
David
________________________________________
To: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
cc: "Earl H Cheek" <echeek@lsu.edu>, "atrous" <atrous@lsu.edu>,
wpinar@lsu.edu, jwander@lsu.edu
bcc: David H Kirshner/dkirsh/LSU
Subject: Re: State Regulation vs Academic Freedom
Gordon Wells <gwells@cats.ucsc.edu>
04/12/2003 05:25 PM MST
David,
Something of the same kind is happening in California. Our Department at
UCSC is currently grappling with the problem of how to meet the State
teacher credentialing requirements while maintaining the values we think
are essential in teacher preparation. At the moment, we are not entirely
dissatisfied as there are good features in the requirements and we are
working with other universities in the state to create a form of
new-teacher
evaluation that is based on classroom performance jn relation to principles
of learning and teaching constructed through coursework, practicum and
reflective discussion during the student teachers' program that is a better
alternative than the context-free tests that the state initially proposed.
You can find out more about the state standards and curriculum, if you're
interested, at: http://www.ctc.ca.gov/SB2042/SB2042_info.html
Gordon
--Gordon Wells UC Santa Cruz. gwells@cats.ucsc.edu http://people.ucsc.edu/~gwells/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 01 2003 - 01:00:09 PDT