Thank you Diane
Ana
At 11:41 PM 5/1/2002 -0600, you wrote:
>Alright, i admit i was initially horrified by the mention of Fodor, but I
>was also
>practicing my kinder gentler Diane, and so waited to see what the point
>was...
>
>but alright. so we ARE talking about the same Fodor
>and i MUST say
>
> "post-structuralism"
>
>if only to suggest that while simple
>(heterosexual white male aieeeeee)
> "models"
>make sense, they don't actually explain complexity or difference or
>anything outside a predictable white boy universe.
>
>and as redundant as that might seem, or as obvious as it might be...
>YIKES!!!!!
>
>Fodor?
>
>please.
>if we're going to launch into academic aristrocrats, let's do HARAWAY or
>BULTER
>before we slip backwards to Fodor, eh?
>
>yikes,
>diane
>
>mike the dude writes:
> >Keith--
> >
> >What are all the figures from Rogoff about that are shadded to show
> >different
> >foci-- individual, group, entire setting with all its particiipants? How
> >can
> >one draw such pictures and make such distinctions and then say they are
> >not
> >distinctions.
> >
> >Lenses?
> >
> >In general, the conflation of rogoff, lave&wenger, wertsch, engestrom,
> >cole,
> >etc ad nauseum needs attention.
> >
> >Sorry I can't really get into this. I am teaching an extra class so our
> >seniors can graduate, teaching via DL at a Community College, and teaching
> >for a colleague who is away for a while. Taking time to breathe is an
> >exertion and this sort of discussion needs to be slow, grounded in texts
> >that are shared, and in knowledge of the trajectory of people's thinking.
> >
> >Short of that, we invite confusion and we have plenty of that! (To which
> >I am adding probably)
> >mike
> >
>
>
>
>
>***************************************************************************************************
>
>"As he half dozed the thought struck him of what it might be like to
>record the reality of things,
> matched with the thoughts and impressions it brought forth.
> To find the edge on which the interior met the exterior space...
> If he could keep some sense of how things really were,
> he might retain a little of it over time.
>The past was always disguising itself, disappearing into the needs
> of the moment. Whatever happened got replaced by the
> official story or competing fictions."
>Robert Stone
>****************************************************************************************************
>
>diane celia hodges
>university of british columbia, centre for the study of curriculum and
>instruction
>vancouver, bc
>mailing address: 46 broadview avenue, pointe claire, qc, H9R 3Z2
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 27 2002 - 08:02:49 PDT