These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.

These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.

Re: abstract cages

From: Eva Ekeblad (eva.ekeblad@goteborg.utfors.se)
Date: Sat Aug 18 2001 - 10:25:22 PDT


Only those two?
wonders
Eva

At 11.06 -0500 01-08-18, Helena Worthen scrobe:
>Dear people -- there is probably some impact on xmca of the development of the
>two other discussion lists that involve xmca people, multilogues and
>pre-intellectus. These have appeared in the last year. Multilogues has
>engaged
>women and has created a supportive, intimate arena; pre-intellectus is men and
>women and has followed its own drift. But these two backchannels have
>undoubtedly had an impact on xmca participation, if only because of the total
>amount of time that anyone has to sit at the computer in a given day. In
>addition, there is a certain amount of rehearsing for xmca that goes on in
>these backchannels.
>
>Helena Worthen



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 01 2001 - 01:02:11 PDT