Well this discussion has taken an interesting semiotic twist.
At 06:21 AM 6/27/01 -0700, you wrote:
>Are you saying that, even though phil and dianes claim agreement, "taken as
>shared" is problematic, or are you posing particular "ideal-internal"(1)
>processes for unpacking what is not appropration?
unpacking what is not appropriation?
Naww. Taken as shared is fine w/ me. It was meant in humour; a bit skewed,
I see. I retract it. Assuming that's agreeable,
Judy
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jul 01 2001 - 01:01:43 PDT