I'm going to stick a toe in the calm waters. I've lurked through most of
this discussion. I'm thinking that maybe you're missing an implicit valance
in Eric's note. I took "not all people were born to be members of a communal
society," as implying that not all communities are well-functioning,
successful group entities, and sometimes you get stuck in one of those. For
instance, one might argue that teachers have a dysfunctional professional
community, have for years, and seem unable to manage a lot of LBE in their
k-12 teaching profession, despite the many disturbances in the system.
Whacha think?
Linda P.
> ----------
> From: Phil Graham
> Reply To: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 10:14 PM
> To: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> Subject: Re: Vygotsky's Crisis in Psychology
>
> At 11:43 PM 31/05/2001 -0400, Eric wrote:
> >not all people were born to be members of a communal society, in my
> >opinion LBE is an explanation of communal living.
>
> If people aren't born into communities, what are they born into?
> Vygotsky's
> central point in "crisis" is that people (specifically children) are
> *firstly* social products. The myth of the lone, asocial, communally
> decontextualised individual is a myth of "Robinsonade" liberal dogmas and
> Garden-of-Eden-like Mythologies.
>
> Are you suggesting that people could be anything but a product of the
> communities they live in, or that they may choose not to exist as members
> of social systems?
>
> regards,
> Phil
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jul 01 2001 - 01:01:00 PDT