Andy wrote:
If I understand you correctly Judy, of
>course we all value the capacity for abstract reasoning, just as no-one
>wants to go back to animism and witch-hunting, but equally we all know that
>the roller-coaster we are on is taking us somewhere we really don't want to
>be, don't we?
It's safe to say that we on this list don't want to go where we've been
catapulted -- (less fatalistically: are being?...). One hypothesis is that,
over time, diverse values (control, rationality, dominance) get so tightly
interwoven in the network of what's become exploitive activity systems of
production & distribution, within which WE are produced -- & thus out of
the control of individuals -- that change can happen only catastrophically
from "outside" or from collapse from within OR
through the agency that individuals direct toward their performance as
ethical, relational beings -- re-visioning and hopefully changing within
critically reflexive social relations and thereby making it possible to
imagine & produce the sort of changes in local systems of activity that
would unfix their internal structures, moving toward dynamic institutions
that are self adjusting toward ethical goals....
well, I am eager to get help in thinking more carefully about possibly
designing better futures so I look forward to seeing the holes that some of
you will thoughtfully point out in the above and the directions others
might take this
judy
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 27 2004 - 11:29:00 PST