i wrote
>Diane on - "the actual objective world always strikes me as kind of a red
>herring - sure, it's there, but we can't know it"
by knowing, i meant in the ways Truths are proposed. i mean, of course
there is a materiality to
existence, there's no denying that bus. i just meant reality is partial,
always, and the actual objective world is partial, incomplete, but
probably you all know that anyhow.
what i was referring to are the assumptions that follow the "actual
objective world" - (the "therefores...")
but hey-honny-ho-honny, Helena's right - it was not her intent to start
debating this,
and the goddesses know me well enough to know i can't get anywhere here
with this sort of needling and wheezing over one little thing.
me shaddaps now.
thanks
diane
**********************************************************************
:point where everything listens.
and i slow down, learning how to
enter - implicate and unspoken (still) heart-of-the-world.
(Daphne Marlatt, "Coming to you")
***********************************************************************
diane celia hodges
university of british columbia, centre for the study of curriculum and
instruction
==================== ==================== =======================
university of colorado, denver, school of education
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 01 2000 - 01:01:36 PST