In Rorty's case (as in Lyotard's) isn't incommensurability
something like cultural relativism? Indicating the impossibility of
collective action which is not always-already repressive (of some un-
emancipated uncollectivised minority)? Discursive muddle does
not preclude the possibility of moving towards common understandings or
good-enough understandings to enable collective action IMHO. In my very
unsubtle understanding of activity it seems to me precisely the category
which enables people to move beyond discursive incommensurability.
>prolepsis...and also, what Rorty is referring to in his discussion of
"incommensurability"
Helen
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Mar 07 2000 - 17:54:15 PST